Effect of Auditor Specialization, Auditor Characteristics, Board Independence on Audit Quality through intellectual capital : Study on service companies
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to examine the effect of auditor specialization, auditor characteristics, and board independence on audit quality through intellectual capital in service companies in West Java. The research was conducted using a quantitative approach with a sample of 384 service companies in West Java. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4.0 software. The results of this study showed that auditor specialization, auditor experience, and board independence had a positive and significant effect on audit quality. Meanwhile, intellectual capital has a significant mediating effect on the relationship between auditor specialization, auditor experience, and board independence on audit quality. The findings of this study provide important insights into the factors that contribute to the enhancement of audit quality in service companies. This study suggests that service companies in West Java should consider hiring specialized auditors, experienced auditors, and independent boards to improve audit quality. Additionally, companies should also focus on the development of intellectual capital, which plays an important role in enhancing audit quality.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
W. M. Al-ahdal and H. A. Hashim, “Impact of audit committee characteristics and external audit quality on firm performance: evidence from India,” Corp. Gov. Int. J. Bus. Soc., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 424–445, 2022.
M. Hutchinson and M. Zain, “Internal audit quality, audit committee independence, growth opportunities and firm performance,” Corp. Ownersh. Control, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 50–65, 2009.
H. Sayyar, R. Basiruddin, S. Z. Rasid, and M. A. Elhabib, “The impact of audit quality on firm performance: Evidence from Malaysia,” J. Adv. Rev. Sci. Res., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2015.
M. Fooladi and Z. A. Shukor, “Board of directors, audit quality and firm performance: evidence from Malaysia,” in National Research & Innovation Conference for Graduate Students in Social Sciences, 2012, pp. 7–9.
C. Lim and H. Tan, “Non‐audit service fees and audit quality: The impact of auditor specialization,” J. Account. Res., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 199–246, 2008.
M. Minutti‐Meza, “Does auditor industry specialization improve audit quality?,” J. Account. Res., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 779–817, 2013.
M. R. Abdillah, A. W. Mardijuwono, and H. Habiburrochman, “The effect of company characteristics and auditor characteristics to audit report lag,” Asian J. Account. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 129–144, 2019.
W. Alissa, V. Capkun, T. Jeanjean, and N. Suca, “An empirical investigation of the impact of audit and auditor characteristics on auditor performance,” Accounting, Organ. Soc., vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 495–510, 2014.
S.-M. Lai and C.-L. Liu, “The effect of auditor characteristics on the value of diversification,” Audit. a J. Pract. theory, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 115–137, 2018.
K. Ye, Y. Cheng, and J. Gao, “How individual auditor characteristics impact the likelihood of audit failure: Evidence from China,” Adv. Account., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 394–401, 2014.
S. Bhagat and B. Bolton, “Corporate governance and firm performance,” J. Corp. Financ., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 257–273, 2008.
F. Lefort and F. Urzúa, “Board independence, firm performance and ownership concentration: Evidence from Chile,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 615–622, 2008.
Y. Liu, M. K. Miletkov, Z. Wei, and T. Yang, “Board independence and firm performance in China,” J. Corp. Financ., vol. 30, pp. 223–244, 2015.
A. N. Abdelrhman, K. Z. Labib, and A. F. Elbayoumi, “Measuring Audit Firms’ Intellectual Capital as a Determinant of Audit Quality: A Suggested Model,” J. Mod. Account. Audit., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 59, 2014.
N. Kalbuana, B. Kurnianto, R. Saputro, O. Hendra, S. Utami, and R. A. Widagdo, “The effect of audit quality, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and intellectual capital toward earning management on transportation corporations in Indonesia,” Solid State Technol., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 9176–9184, 2020.
W. K. Peprah, “The Moderating Effect of Gender on the Relationship Between Intellectual Capital and Audit Quality,” Adv. Soc. Sci. Res. J., vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 105–115, 2019.
D. Kartikasari, “The effect of export, import and investment to economic growth of Riau Islands Indonesia,” Int. J. Econ. Financ. Issues, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 663–667, 2017.
K. Low, “The effects of industry specialization on audit risk assessments and audit‐planning decisions,” Account. Rev., vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 201–219, 2004.
A. Duru, R. J. Iyengar, and E. M. Zampelli, “The dynamic relationship between CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating role of board independence,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 4269–4277, 2016.
M. L. DeFond, K. Raghunandan, and K. R. Subramanyam, “Do non–audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions,” J. Account. Res., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1247–1274, 2002.
A. Elaoud and A. Jarboui, “Auditor specialization, accounting information quality and investment efficiency,” Res. Int. Bus. Financ., vol. 42, pp. 616–629, 2017.
S. P. Sari, A. A. Diyanti, and R. Wijayanti, “The effect of audit tenure, audit rotation, audit fee, accounting firm size, and auditor specialization to audit quality,” Ris. Akunt. dan Keuang. Indones., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 186–196, 2019.
J. Krishnan, “Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis,” Account. Rev., vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 649–675, 2005.
Q. Wu, Q. He, Y. Duan, and N. O’Regan, “Implementing dynamic capabilities for corporate strategic change toward sustainability,” Strateg. Chang., vol. 21, no. 5, p. 231, 2012.
M. Khalil and A. Ozkan, “Board independence, audit quality and earnings management: Evidence from Egypt,” J. Emerg. Mark. Financ., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 84–118, 2016.
J. C. Bedard and K. M. Johnstone, “Earnings manipulation risk, corporate governance risk, and auditors’ planning and pricing decisions,” Account. Rev., vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 277–304, 2004.
M. Guizani and G. Abdalkrim, “Ownership structure and audit quality: the mediating effect of board independence,” Corp. Gov. Int. J. Bus. Soc., 2021.
P. Jiraporn, P. Chintrakarn, S. Tong, and S. Treepongkaruna, “Does board independence substitute for external audit quality? Evidence from an exogenous regulatory shock,” Aust. J. Manag., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 27–41, 2018.
D. F. Earnest and S. Sofian, “The mediating role of corporate governance on intellectual capital and corporate performance,” J. Econ. Bus. Manag., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 339–342, 2013.
R. N. Astuti, F. Fachrurrozie, M. I. Amal, and S. F. Zahra, “Does audit committee quality mediate determinants of intellectual capital disclosure?,” J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus., vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 199–208, 2020.
S. Istanti, A. Chariri, and A. Juliarto, “The role of intellectual capital as a mediation of relationship between audit committee and real earnings management,” Accounting, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 1799–1804, 2021.
R. V Krejcie and D. W. Morgan, “Determining sample size for research activities,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 607–610, 1970.