A Comprehensive Bibliometric Review of Material Misstatement Studies in Accounting Literature
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to explore the intellectual structure, research trends, and thematic evolution of material misstatement studies within accounting literature through a comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Using data collected from reputable databases over the period 2010–2025, this study applies bibliometric techniques, including co-occurrence analysis, network visualization, overlay visualization, and density mapping using VOSviewer. The findings reveal that early research predominantly focused on fraud detection and accounting misstatements, highlighting the role of auditing in identifying financial irregularities. Over time, the literature has shifted toward more systematic and process-oriented themes, particularly risk assessment, analytical procedures, and auditing practices. Recent trends indicate a growing emphasis on audit quality as a key outcome variable, reflecting the increasing importance of audit effectiveness, governance, and financial reporting reliability. The results also show that while core themes such as fraud and risk assessment remain highly dominant, emerging areas like audit quality are developing as distinct yet significant research streams. This study contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive mapping of material misstatement research, offering insights into its development, current focus, and future directions. The findings suggest the need for further integration of traditional auditing approaches with emerging technologies and interdisciplinary perspectives to enhance the detection and prevention of material misstatements.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
[1] T. Doan and T. T. Ta, “Factors of fraud triangle affecting the likelihood of material misstatements in financial statements: An empirical study,” J. Gov. Regul., 2023, doi: 10.22495/jgrv12i1art8.
[2] D. Žukauskaitė and D. Daujotaitė, “Identification of Material Misstatement and Specific Risk Factors in an Audit of Financial Statements,” Buhalterinės Apskait. Teor. ir Prakt., 2022, doi: 10.15388/batp.2022.46.
[3] Y. Ostapenko, “Materiality Level in the Audit of Financial Statements and Its Impact on the Auditor’s Professional Judgment,” Oblik i Finans., 2024, doi: 10.33146/2307-9878-2024-4(106)-69-75.
[4] M. Tavares, M. Almeida, J. Vale, and A. Kapo, “Audit 5.0 in Risk and Materiality Assessment: An Ethnographic Approach,” J. Risk Financ. Manag., 2025, doi: 10.3390/jrfm18080419.
[5] S. Yu and J. Rha, “Research Trends in Accounting Fraud Using Network Analysis,” Sustainability, vol. 13, p. 5579, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13105579.
[6] E. Maksymov, M. Peecher, A. Sutherland, and J. Weber, “Audit Partners’ Role in Material Misstatement Resolution: Survey and Interview Evidence,” SSRN Electron. J., 2023, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4459495.
[7] N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 133, pp. 285–296, 2021.
[8] M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis,” J. Informetr., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975, 2017.
[9] P. M. DECHOW, W. GE, C. R. LARSON, and R. G. SLOAN, “Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements,” Contemp. Account. Res., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 17–82, Mar. 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x.
[10] Z.-V. PALMROSE and S. SCHOLZ, “The Circumstances and Legal Consequences of Non-GAAP Reporting: Evidence from Restatements,” Contemp. Account. Res., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 139–180, Mar. 2004, doi: https://doi.org/10.1506/WBF9-Y69X-L4DX-JMV1.
[11] J. Dorminey, A. S. Fleming, M.-J. Kranacher, and R. A. Riley Jr., “The Evolution of Fraud Theory,” Issues Account. Educ., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 555–579, May 2012, doi: 10.2308/iace-50131.
[12] S. C. RICE and D. P. WEBER, “How Effective Is Internal Control Reporting under SOX 404? Determinants of the (Non-)Disclosure of Existing Material Weaknesses,” J. Account. Res., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 811–843, Jun. 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2011.00434.x.
[13] R. Hoitash and U. Hoitash, “Measuring Accounting Reporting Complexity with XBRL,” Account. Rev., vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 259–287, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.2308/accr-51762.
[14] J. Bertomeu, E. Cheynel, E. Floyd, and W. Pan, “Using machine learning to detect misstatements,” Rev. Account. Stud., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 468–519, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11142-020-09563-8.
[15] C. S. Lennox, J. J. Schmidt, and A. M. Thompson, “Why are expanded audit reports not informative to investors? Evidence from the United Kingdom,” Rev. Account. Stud., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 497–532, 2023.
[16] D. Amiram, Z. Bozanic, and E. Rouen, “Financial statement errors: evidence from the distributional properties of financial statement numbers,” Rev. Account. Stud., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1540–1593, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11142-015-9333-z.
[17] K. K. Jeppesen, “The role of auditing in the fight against corruption,” Br. Account. Rev., vol. 51, no. 5, p. 100798, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2018.06.001.
[18] J. R. Kurpierz and K. Smith, “The greenwashing triangle: adapting tools from fraud to improve CSR reporting,” Sustain. Accounting, Manag. Policy J., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1075–1093, May 2020, doi: 10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2018-0272.