Performance Evaluation of Contemporary Software Development Frameworks in Dynamic Environments
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study presents a comparative performance evaluation of widely used frameworks, including Waterfall, Agile, DevOps, and DevOps integrated with microservices architecture. The evaluation is based on key performance indicators derived from industry-standard metrics such as deployment frequency, lead time, change failure rate, mean time to recovery (MTTR), response time, throughput, scalability, and resource utilization. The findings, illustrated through two analytical figures, demonstrate that traditional frameworks such as Waterfall exhibit limited adaptability, characterized by low deployment frequency, high lead time, and poor scalability. Agile frameworks improve flexibility and responsiveness through iterative development, yet they show moderate performance in handling dynamic workloads. In contrast, DevOps frameworks significantly enhance performance by integrating continuous integration and continuous delivery practices, resulting in improved deployment speed, reduced failure rates, and faster recovery times. The highest level of performance is observed in the DevOps combined with microservices architecture, which achieves superior results across all evaluated metrics. This is primarily due to the decentralized and modular nature of microservices, which allows independent deployment and efficient fault isolation. Overall, the study highlights the critical role of modern software development frameworks in addressing the challenges of dynamic environments. The results provide valuable insights for organizations in selecting appropriate frameworks to optimize performance and maintain competitiveness in rapidly evolving technological landscapes.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
[1] D. Zhang, J. Yin, X. Zhu, and C. Zhang, “Network representation learning: A survey,” IEEE Trans. Big Data, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3–28, 2018.
[2] W. W. Royce, “Managing the development of large software systems,” in Proceedings of IEEE WESCON, 1970, pp. 1–9.
[3] J. Sutherland and K. Schwaber, “The scrum papers,” Nuts, bolts Orig. an Agil. Process, 2007.
[4] D. J. Anderson, Kanban: successful evolutionary change for your technology business. Blue hole press, 2010.
[5] J. Stapleton, DSDM: Business focused development. Pearson education, 2003.
[6] N. Forsgren, J. Humble, and G. Kim, Accelerate: The science of lean software and devops: Building and scaling high performing technology organizations. IT Revolution, 2018.
[7] Z. Stojanov, I. Hristoski, J. Stojanov, and A. Stojkov, “A tertiary study on microservices: Research trends and recommendations,” Program. Comput. Softw., vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 796–821, 2023.
[8] A. Gwangwadza and R. Hanslo, “Factors that contribute to the success of a software organisation’s DevOps environment: a systematic review,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv2211.04101, 2022.
[9] B. Kitchenham, “Procedures for performing systematic reviews,” Keele, UK, Keele Univ., vol. 33, no. 2004, pp. 1–26, 2004.
[10] D. Merkel, “Docker: lightweight linux containers for consistent development and deployment,” Linux j, vol. 239, no. 2, p. 2, 2014.
[11] C. Pahl, “Containerization and the paas cloud,” IEEE Cloud Comput., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 24–31, 2015.
[12] Q. Zhang, L. Cheng, and R. Boutaba, “Cloud computing: state-of-the-art and research challenges,” J. internet Serv. Appl., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–18, 2010.
[13] J. Gubbi, R. Buyya, S. Marusic, and M. Palaniswami, “Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions,” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1645–1660, 2013.
[14] L. Bass, I. Weber, and L. Zhu, DevOps: A software architect’s perspective. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2015.
[15] M. Ali, S. U. Khan, and A. V Vasilakos, “Security in cloud computing: Opportunities and challenges,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 305, pp. 357–383, 2015.
[16] Md. Ishtiaque Alam, Mohammad Abdus Sami, Md Abu Kawsar Prodhan Hemal, and Md Lutfor Rahman, “Predictive Analytics and Decision Intelligence for Climate-Resilient Agritech Systems,” Acad. Glob. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. Stud., vol. 2, no. 1 SE-Research Article, pp. 44–56, 2023, doi: 10.32996/agjcsts.2023.2.1.4.
[17] T. R. Sikder, S. Dash, B. Uddin, and F. Hossain, “AI-Powered Data Analytics and Multi-Omics Integration for Next-Generation Precision Oncology and Anticancer Drug Development,” Eastasouth J. Inf. Syst. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 02 SE-Articles, pp. 153–170, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.58812/esiscs.v1i02.838.
[18] N. Vanu, M. R. Hasan, T. R. Sikder, and Z. S. Tamanna, “AI-Driven Big Data Analytics for Precision Medicine: A Unified Framework Integrating Molecular Data Intelligence, Wearable Health Systems, and Predictive Modeling,” J. Comput. Sci. Technol. Stud., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 124–141, 2021.
[19] I. Baldini et al., “Serverless computing: Current trends and open problems,” in Research advances in cloud computing, Springer, 2017, pp. 1–20.