Development and Evaluation of an Internet of Things Based Wearable Sensor System for Real-Time Monitoring and Remote Management of Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Patients
Main Article Content
Abstract
Musculoskeletal rehabilitation needs people to keep track of how patients are moving after they leave the clinic. The usual way of following up with patients after they leave the clinic has some problems. Patients can only visit the clinic often they have to tell us how they are feeling and some patients live really far from the clinic. This paper looks at twenty-one studies that were published between 2019 and 2025. These studies are about using Internet of Things based sensor systems to monitor musculoskeletal rehabilitation patients in real time. The patients in these studies were recovering from things like knee arthroplasty, post-stroke upper-limb impairment and hip and knee osteoarthritis. The systems that were studied have three parts: sensing, edge or network and cloud or application layers. The paper examines how these systems operate, such as how they detect movement, how they communicate with one another and how they interpret data. The paper also examines the tracking capabilities of these systems – such as movement, muscle activity, patient feelings and how they communicate this information to doctors. The paper compares these systems and discovers that some systems are more adept at tracking leg motion, and others, arm motion. Systems with inertial measurement units, for instance, are able to follow leg motion, while systems with surface electromyography and accelerometers are able to follow arm motion in stroke patients. In one study, they looked at many studies and found that patients who used remote monitoring systems were less likely to require rehospitalization, and they were not in the hospital as long. They were also not required to come into the clinic frequently, and were more likely to adhere to their treatment plan. In a few small studies, which used an inertial platform to track the patients after knee replacement surgery, it was determined that these devices were effective and there was no loss of accuracy if utilized within the home environment. The ability to interact with other computers, and learn from the result of the data collected, is the key to making these systems effective, it concludes the paper. The biggest problems that are still preventing these systems from being widely used are that they do not work well with systems they are not secure and there are problems, with how they will be paid for through 2025. Although the rehabilitation of musculoskeletal and the Internet of Things based sensor systems are improving, they still have some challenges to be addressed. In the future, the Internet of Things (IoT) sensor systems will continue to be employed in musculoskeletal rehabilitation.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
[1] N. Al Bassam, S. A. Hussain, A. Al Qaraghuli, J. Khan, E. P. Sumesh, and V. Lavanya, “IoT based wearable device to monitor the signs of quarantined remote patients of COVID-19,” Informatics Med. Unlocked, vol. 24, no. 100588, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2021.100588.
[2] H. Alasmary, “ScalableDigitalHealth (SDH): An IoT-Based Scalable Framework for Remote Patient Monitoring,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24041346.
[3] V. Antoniou, C. H. Davos, E. Kapreli, L. Batalik, D. B. Panagiotakos, and G. Pepera, “Effectiveness of Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation, Using Wearable Sensors, as a Multicomponent, Cutting-Edge Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” J. Clin. Med., vol. 11, no. 13, pp. 1–29, 2022, doi: 10.3390/jcm11133772.
[4] E. T. R. Babar and M. U. Rahman, “A Smart, Low Cost, Wearable Technology for Remote Patient Monitoring,” IEEE Sens. J., vol. 21, no. 19, pp. 21947–21955, 2021, doi: doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3101146.
[5] K. M. Bell et al., “Verification of a portable motion tracking system for remote management of physical rehabilitation of the knee,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 5, 2019, doi: 10.3390/s19051021.
[6] K. M. Bell et al., “A portable system for remote rehabilitation following a total knee replacement: A pilot randomized controlled clinical study,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 21, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20216118.
[7] M. W. Bhatt and S. Sharma, “An IoMT-Based Approach for Real-Time Monitoring Using Wearable Neuro-Sensors,” J. Healthc. Eng., vol. 2023, no. 1, p. 1066547, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1066547.
[8] S. V. Duff et al., “Quantifying intra- and interlimb use during unimanual and bimanual tasks in persons with hemiparesis post-stroke,” J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01020-8.
[9] G. J. Kim, A. Parnadi, S. Eva, and H. Schambra, “The use of wearable sensors to assess and treat the upper extremity after stroke: a scoping review,” Disabil. Rehabil., vol. 44, no. 20, pp. 6119–6138, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1957027.
[10] N. Lou et al., “A Portable Wearable Inertial System for Rehabilitation Monitoring and Evaluation of Patients With Total Knee Replacement,” Front. Neurorobot., vol. 16, no. March, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.836184.
[11] P. Maceira-Elvira, T. Popa, A.-C. Schmid, and F. C. Hummel, “Wearable technology in stroke rehabilitation: towards improved diagnosis and treatment of upper-limb motor impairment,” J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 16, no. 142, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0612-y.
[12] A. S. Nunes, İ. Yildiz Potter, R. K. Mishra, P. Bonato, and A. Vaziri, “A deep learning wearable-based solution for continuous at-home monitoring of upper limb goal-directed movements,” Front. Neurol., vol. Volume 14, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1295132.
[13] C. V. F. Pereira, E. M. de Oliveira, and A. D. de Souza, “Machine Learning Applied to Edge Computing and Wearable Devices for Healthcare: Systematic Mapping of the Literature,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 19, 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24196322.
[14] M. J. Rose, K. E. Costello, S. Eigenbrot, K. Torabian, and D. Kumar, “Inertial Measurement Units and Application for Remote Health Care in Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: Narrative Review,” JMIR Rehabil. Assist. Technol., vol. 9, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.2196/33521.
[15] N. J. Seo, K. Coupland, C. Finetto, and G. Scronce, “Wearable Sensor to Monitor Quality of Upper Limb Task Practice for Stroke Survivors at Home,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 2, p. 554, 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24020554.
[16] T. Shaik, X. Tao, N. Higgins, R. G. Lin Li, X. Zhou, and U. R. Acharya, “Remote patient monitoring using artificial intelligence: Current state, applications, and challenges,” WIREs Data Min. Knowl. Discov., vol. 13, no. 2, p. e1485, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1485.
[17] T. Stevens et al., “A cyber-physical system for near real-time monitoring of at-home orthopedic rehabilitation and mobile-based provider-patient communications to improve adherence: Development and formative evaluation,” JMIR Hum. Factors, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2020, doi: 10.2196/16605.
[18] S. Y. Tan, J. Sumner, Y. Wang, and A. Wenjun Yip, “A systematic review of the impacts of remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions on safety, adherence, quality-of-life and cost-related outcomes,” npj Digit. Med., vol. 7, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01182-w.
[19] R. Uddin and I. Koo, “Real-Time Remote Patient Monitoring: A Review of Biosensors Integrated with Multi-Hop IoT Systems via Cloud Connectivity,” Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 5, p. 1876, 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14051876.
[20] S. Wei and Z. Wu, “The Application of Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning Algorithms in Rehabilitation Training: A Systematic Review,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 18, pp. 1–30, 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23187667.
[21] C. Yang, L. Shang, S. Yao, J. Ma, and C. Xu, “Cost, time savings and effectiveness of wearable devices for remote monitoring of patient rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial,” J. Orthop. Surg. Res., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03898-z.