Scalable CRM Workflow Automation for High-Volume Customer Onboarding: An Event-Driven Salesforce Architecture
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems face issues when onboarding customers to the system with high volumes and when processing large groups of employees, precision of data and system dependability. In the current paper we provide a proposed Salesforce architecture which will be based on scalable, event-driven architecture which will be used to automate the process of customer onboarding by asynchronously processing and distributing workloads across the facilities and by utilizing structured validation processes. It is proposed that Queueable Apex and Batch Apex would be combined in the suggested architecture to address the workloads of various scales, synchronous processing limitations, and give an avenue to carry out large-scale onboarding operations with the assistance of the concise execution. Integration services enable Salesforce to communicate data with other systems in businesses, and validation features identify incomplete records, duplicate records, and inconsistency and then bar data persistence. A structured error management system helps in managing exceptions, retries with locally controlled failure handling, localizing failures and performance monitoring. Event driven coordination is also provided in the architecture to decouple processing phases to make it responsive and dynamic flow of transactions. Scalability, processing dependability, data integrity, the use of resources, and user experience are the main assessment aspects in its evaluation framework. The solution proposed will decrease the response times of interfaces, and provide clear onboarding status and actionable feedback, by decoupling the user-facing UI and resource consumptive background processes. The framework offers a useful structural system to organizations aspiring to revamp Salesforce-built onboarding procedures, to ensure that they are efficient and capable of operating with a high number of employees without compromising the quality and maintainability of the data in the end.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
[1] J. Baker, D. Jones, Q. Cao, and J. Song, “Conceptualizing the dynamic strategic alignment competency,” J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 12, no. 4, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00265.
[2] A. Cruz and A. Vasconcelos, “Towards a reference enterprise application architecture for the customer relationship management domain,” Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2015), vol. 3. pp. 185–195, 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.5220/0005332401850195.
[3] J. Krumeich, D. Werth, and P. Loos, “Prescriptive control of business processes,” Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng., vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 261–280, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0412-2.
[4] C. Zaby and K. D. Wilde, “Intelligent business processes in CRM: Exemplified by complaint management,” Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 289–304, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0480-6.
[5] A. Colicev, A. Kumar, and P. O’Connor, “Modeling the relationship between firm and user generated content and the stages of the marketing funnel,” Int. J. Res. Mark., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 100–116, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.09.005.
[6] C. Pinheiro, A. Vasconcelos, and S. Guerreiro, “Microservice architecture from enterprise architecture management perspective,” in Business Modeling and Software Design, vol. 356, B. Shishkov, Ed. Springer, 2019, pp. 236–245. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24854-3_17.
[7] H. Song, P. H. Nguyen, F. Chauvel, J. M. Glattetre, and T. Schjerpen, “Customizing multi-tenant SaaS by microservices: A reference architecture,” 2019 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS). IEEE, pp. 446–448, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2019.00081.
[8] A. Abdallah, A. Abran, and B. Abdallah, “Towards the adoption of international standards in enterprise architecture measurement,” Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Data Science, E-Learning and Information Systems (DATA ’19). ACM, pp. 1–7, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3368691.3368715.
[9] J. P. A. Almeida, G. Guizzardi, T. P. Sales, and R. A. Falbo, “gUFO: A lightweight implementation of the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO).” 2019. doi: http://purl.org/nemo/doc/gufo.
[10] G. Guizzardi, G. Wagner, J. P. A. Almeida, and R. S. S. Guizzardi, “Towards ontological foundations for conceptual modeling: The Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO) story,” Appl. Ontol., vol. 10, no. 3–4, pp. 259–271, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-150157.
[11] D. Magro and A. Goy, “A core reference ontology for the customer relationship domain,” Appl. Ontol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–48, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-2012-0102.
[12] E. W. T. Ngai, L. Xiu, and D. C. K. Chau, “Application of data mining techniques in customer relationship management: A literature review and classification,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 2592–2602, 2009.
[13] A. Payne and P. Frow, “A strategic framework for customer relationship management,” J. Mark., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 167–176, 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.167.
[14] K. N. Lemon and P. C. Verhoef, “Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey,” J. Mark., vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 69–96, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0420.
[15] S. T. March and G. F. Smith, “Design and natural science research on information technology,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 251–266, 1995, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2.
[16] K. Peffers, T. Tuunanen, M. A. Rothenberger, and S. Chatterjee, “A design science research methodology for information systems research,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 45–77, 2007.