Evaluating AI Responses: A Step-by-Step Approach for Test Automation
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications are transforming business operations, yet ensuring the accuracy, relevance, and reliability of AI-generated responses remains a critical challenge. This paper explores various methodologies for AI response evaluation, progressing from basic string comparisons to machine learning (ML)-based assessments and advanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques. We examine the advantages and limitations of each approach, illustrating their applicability with C# implementations. Our findings suggest that while traditional methods like fuzzy matching provide quick validation, ML-based and RAG-based approaches offer superior contextual understanding and accuracy. The study highlights the importance of automated evaluation pipelines for AI systems and discusses future research directions in improving AI response testing methodologies.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
J. Metan, D. Kumar, D. A. N, and H. Kumar, “An Automated Approach to Subjective Answer Evaluation Using ML and NLP,” 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIT61638.2024.10690635.
Z. Ashktorab et al., “Aligning Human and LLM Judgments: Insights from EvalAssist on Task-Specific Evaluations and AI-assisted Assessment Strategy Preferences,” arXiv:2410.00873, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.00873.
Z. Wang and C. Ormerod, “Generative Language Models with Retrieval Augmented Generation for Automated Short Answer Scoring,” arXiv:2408.03811, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.03811.
R. Li, R. Li, B. Wang, and X. Du, “IQA-EVAL: Automatic Evaluation of Human-Model Interactive Question Answering,” arXiv:2408.13545, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.13545.
S. Sivasothy, S. Barnett, S. Kurniawan, Z. Rasool, and R. Vasa, “RAGProbe: An Automated Approach for Evaluating RAG Applications,” arXiv:2409.19019, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.19019.
A. Sudjianto and S. Neppalli, “Human-Calibrated Automated Testing and Validation of Generative Language Models: An Overview,” SSRN, 2024, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5019627.
S. McAvinue and K. Dev, “Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Models using Key Metrics and Emerging Tools,” Authorea, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.172225490.00673881/v1.
S. McAvinue and K. Dev, “Comparative evaluation of Large Language Models using key metrics and emerging tools,” Expert Syst., pp. 42(2), e13719, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.13719.
G. Guinet, B. Omidvar-Tehrani, A. Deoras, and L. Callot, “Automated Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Language Models with Task-Specific Exam Generation,” arXiv:2405.13622, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.13622.
A. Agrawal et al., “Transforming Student Assessment in Higher Education: The Role of Artificial Intelligence Tools,” in Improving Student Assessment With Emerging AI Tools, IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025, pp. 363–386. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-6170-2.ch013.
J. Smith, “Evaluating AI Responses: A Comparative Study,” J. Artif. Intell. Res., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 123–145, 2022.
M. Johnson and K. Lee, “Machine Learning Approaches for Contextual Understanding in AI Evaluations,” Int. J. Mach. Learn., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 67–89, 2022.
A. Doe and J. Smith, “Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A New Paradigm for High-Accuracy AI Responses,” Proc. AI Conf., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 202–210, 2023.
R. Brown, J. Smith, and M. Johnson, “Towards Standardized Frameworks for AI Response Evaluation,” AI Res. J., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 333–350, 2023.