APEX: Adaptive Personal EXperience Agents A Cost-Efficient, Privacy-Preserving Architecture for Scalable AI Assistants

Main Article Content

Abhishek Pareek
Udit Misra
Divya Chukkapalli

Abstract

Personal AI agents deployed on user devices operate under fundamentally different constraints than shared cloud services. These systems must maintain conversation context across extended periods, function efficiently despite irregular usage patterns, handle complex requests, allocate computation intelligently, and protect sensitive data. We present APEX, an architecture addressing these five challenges through integrated design. APEX comprises five technical contributions: (1) a hierarchical memory system achieving 84% storage reduction through progressive compression; (2) a predictive activation mechanism reducing per-user compute costs by 73% while maintaining sub-5-second startup latency; (3) a task decomposition engine with 94% end-to-end accuracy; (4) a cost-aware routing layer reducing API consumption by 61%; (5) federated personalization enabling on-device learning while preserving privacy. Six-month production deployment reduced per-user monthly costs from $156 to $42 with positive user satisfaction scores, demonstrating practical efficiency at scale.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pareek, A., Misra, U., & Chukkapalli, D. (2026). APEX: Adaptive Personal EXperience Agents A Cost-Efficient, Privacy-Preserving Architecture for Scalable AI Assistants. The Eastasouth Journal of Information System and Computer Science, 3(03), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.58812/esiscs.v3i03.935
Section
Articles

References

[1] S. Yao et al., “React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv2210.03629, 2022.

[2] T. Schick et al., “Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools,” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 36, pp. 68539–68551, 2023.

[3] C. Packer, V. Fang, S. Patil, K. Lin, S. Wooders, and J. Gonzalez, “MemGPT: towards LLMs as operating systems.,” 2023.

[4] J. S. Park, J. O’Brien, C. J. Cai, M. R. Morris, P. Liang, and M. S. Bernstein, “Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior,” in Proceedings of the 36th annual acm symposium on user interface software and technology, 2023, pp. 1–22.

[5] P. Lewis et al., “Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks,” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 33, pp. 9459–9474, 2020.

[6] L. Chen, M. Zaharia, and J. Zou, “Frugalgpt: How to use large language models while reducing cost and improving performance,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv2305.05176, 2023.

[7] B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y Arcas, “Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data,” in Artificial intelligence and statistics, 2017, pp. 1273–1282.

[8] C. Dwork, F. McSherry, K. Nissim, and A. Smith, “Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis,” in Theory of cryptography conference, 2006, pp. 265–284.

[9] T. Dettmers, M. Lewis, Y. Belkada, and L. Zettlemoyer, “Gpt3. int8 (): 8-bit matrix multiplication for transformers at scale,” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 35, pp. 30318–30332, 2022.

[10] W. Fedus, B. Zoph, and N. Shazeer, “Switch transformers: Scaling to trillion parameter models with simple and efficient sparsity,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 23, no. 120, pp. 1–39, 2022.