Bank Emok: Conflict Analysis and Sustainable Solution Efforts from the Perspective of Risk Society Theory

Main Article Content

Aji Satria Nugraha
Djilzaran Nurul Suhada

Abstract

Bank Emok is a term for the people of Solear District, Tangerang Regency, Banten Province for institutions that are similar to conventional banks in general, but these banks are illegal and owned by individuals who rely on loan sharks to run their operating systems. This research attempts to describe the phenomenon of the increasing number of customers from Bank Emok who are trapped in debt with large interest rates, making it difficult for them to escape. This research uses qualitative methods with a case study approach and analysis of Ulrich Beck's community risk theory to be able to see and investigate more deeply the phenomena that occur in the community of Solear District, Tangerang Regency, Banten. From the analysis of the data obtained, the researcher outlined a strategy to ensure that regional governments, the private sector, and the community escape the trap of the Bank Emok because it has been proven that in several areas of West Java, there are often conflicts between the community and the bank.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nugraha, A. S., & Suhada, D. N. (2024). Bank Emok: Conflict Analysis and Sustainable Solution Efforts from the Perspective of Risk Society Theory. The Eastasouth Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 1(03), 168 –. https://doi.org/10.58812/esssh.v1i03.270
Section
Articles

References

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), “Survei Nasional Inklusi Keuangan 2022,” 2022. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/publikasi/Pages/Survei-Nasional-Inklusi-Keuangan-2022.aspxJ

G. Ritzer and D. J. Goodman, Teori Sosiologi Modern (Edisi Keenam). Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2004.

B. Awal, “Bank Emok Resahkan Warga, Ini Dia Sejarah dan Cerita di Belakangnya,” 2023.

R. Collins, Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Science. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

S. Wignjosoebroto, Paradigma, Metode, dan Dinamika Masalahnya. Jakarta: Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat (ELSAM), 2002.

Smeru Research Institute, “Pemetaan Sektor Keuangan Non-Formal di Indonesia,” 2021. https://smeru.or.id/id/content/pemetaan-sektor-keuangan-non-formal-di-indonesia

Kompas, “Praktik Bank Keliling Ilegal Masih Marak, Waspada Jerat Hukumnya,” 2021. https://money.kompas.com/read/2021/10/15/191500026/praktik-bank-keliling-ilegal-masih-marak-waspada-jerat-hukumnya

Kemenkeu, “Strategi Nasional Keuangan Inklusif,” 2024. https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/publikasi/berita/strategi-nasional-keuangan-inklusif/, 2020 (accessed Apr. 22, 2024).

Kontan, “Kerjasama Penting untuk Memerangi Bank Keliling Ilegal,” 2022. https://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/kerjasama-penting-untuk-memerangi-bank-keliling-ilegal (accessed Mar. 28, 2022).

Tempo, “Polri Ungkap 3 Kasus Bank Keliling Ilegal, Total Kerugian Rp2,7 Miliar,” 2023. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1682458/polri-ungkap-3-kasus-bank-keliling-ilegal-total-kerugian-rp2-7-miliar

J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA.: SAGE Publications, 2018.

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2014.

U. Beck, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications, 1992.

U. Beck, The Reinvention of Politics: Towards a Theory of Reflexive Modernization. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (pp. 1-55). Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994.