Bibliometric Insights into Mental Health Challenges and Innovations in Contemporary Society

Main Article Content

Loso Judijanto
Tera Lesmana

Abstract

This bibliometric analysis examines the evolution and current state of mental health research from a comprehensive, data-driven perspective. Using VOSviewer for visual mapping, this study highlights key terms, thematic developments, and influential authors within the field over several decades. The analysis reveals a strong ongoing focus on core issues such as "mental illness," "anxiety," and "depression," alongside a notable rise in the integration of technological innovations like telepsychiatry and mobile health applications. The study also identifies significant authorship networks that suggest robust collaborative efforts, which are crucial for advancing research and implementing effective mental health interventions. The findings point towards an increasing recognition of the impact of social and environmental factors on mental health, suggesting new directions for future research and policy-making. This study underscores the need for a dynamic approach to mental health research, one that adapts to emerging challenges and leverages technological advances to improve access to care and treatment outcomes.

Article Details

How to Cite
Judijanto, L., & Lesmana, T. (2024). Bibliometric Insights into Mental Health Challenges and Innovations in Contemporary Society. The Eastasouth Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 2(01), 37 –. https://doi.org/10.58812/esssh.v2i01.343
Section
Articles

References

P. J. Smith and R. M. Merwin, “The role of exercise in management of mental health disorders: an integrative review,” Annu. Rev. Med., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 45–62, 2021.

W. H. Organization, “COVID-19 global risk communication and community engagement strategy, December 2020-May 2021: interim guidance, 23 December 2020,” World Health Organization, 2020.

B. Green, K. Jones, R. Lyerla, W. Dyar, and M. Skidmore, “Stigma and behavioral health literacy among individuals with proximity to mental health or substance use conditions,” J. Ment. Heal., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 481–487, 2021.

J. F. Murphy, L. B. Amin, S. T. Celikkaleli, H. E. Brown, and U. Tapan, “Disparities in cancer care in individuals with severe mental illness: A narrative review,” Cancer Epidemiol., vol. 93, p. 102663, 2024.

W. D. S. Killgore, S. A. Cloonan, E. C. Taylor, and N. S. Dailey, “Mental health during the first weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States,” Front. Psychiatry, vol. 12, p. 561898, 2021.

J. Gunawan, S. Juthamanee, and Y. Aungsuroch, “Current mental health issues in the era of Covid-19,” Asian J. Psychiatr., vol. 51, p. 102103, 2020.

Z. Cheng, S. Mendolia, A. R. Paloyo, D. A. Savage, and M. Tani, “Working parents, financial insecurity, and childcare: mental health in the time of COVID-19 in the UK,” Rev. Econ. Househ., vol. 19, pp. 123–144, 2021.

K. K. Patel, A. Pal, K. Saurav, and P. Jain, “Mental health detection using transformer bert,” in Handbook of Research on Lifestyle Sustainability and Management Solutions Using AI, Big Data Analytics, and Visualization, IGI Global, 2022, pp. 91–108.

E. Dragioti et al., “A large‐scale meta‐analytic atlas of mental health problems prevalence during the COVID‐19 early pandemic,” J. Med. Virol., vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1935–1949, 2022.

N. M. Simon, G. N. Saxe, and C. R. Marmar, “Mental health disorders related to COVID-19–related deaths,” Jama, vol. 324, no. 15, pp. 1493–1494, 2020.

M. Cleary, C. Schafer, L. McLean, and D. C. Visentin, “Mental health and well-being in the health workplace,” Issues Ment. Health Nurs., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 172–175, 2020.

N. Van Eck and L. Waltman, “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523–538, 2010.

R. C. Kessler et al., “Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey,” Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 8–19, 1994.

I. H. Meyer, “Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence.,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 129, no. 5, p. 674, 2003.

R. C. Kessler, W. T. Chiu, O. Demler, and E. E. Walters, “Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication,” Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 617–627, 2005.

L. A. Palinkas, S. M. Horwitz, C. A. Green, J. P. Wisdom, N. Duan, and K. Hoagwood, “Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research,” Adm. policy Ment. Heal. Ment. Heal. Serv. Res., vol. 42, pp. 533–544, 2015.

R. L. Spitzer, K. Kroenke, J. B. W. Williams, P. H. Q. P. C. S. Group, and P. H. Q. P. C. S. Group, “Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study,” Jama, vol. 282, no. 18, pp. 1737–1744, 1999.

J. Lai et al., “Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019,” JAMA Netw. open, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. e203976–e203976, 2020.

W. H. Organization, World Health Statistics 2016 [OP]: Monitoring Health for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). World Health Organization, 2016.

T. Insel et al., “Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders,” American Journal of psychiatry, vol. 167, no. 7. Am Psychiatric Assoc, pp. 748–751, 2010.

C. W. Hoge, C. A. Castro, S. C. Messer, D. McGurk, D. I. Cotting, and R. L. Koffman, “Combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, mental health problems, and barriers to care,” N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 351, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2004.

J. A. Durlak and E. P. DuPre, “Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation,” Am. J. Community Psychol., vol. 41, pp. 327–350, 2008.