The Collapse of Syria: A Case of the failure of Counter-Insurgency (COIN) from Clausewitz Trinity Perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Syrian conflict, beginning in 2011, escalated into a complex civil war, challenging the government's counterinsurgency (COIN) efforts. This study analyzes Syria's COIN failure through Clausewitz's Trinity, focusing on the interplay between government, military, and people. Using qualitative document analysis, data from government reports, academic articles, and expert analyses are examined. The research highlights an imbalance in Clausewitz's Trinity: the Assad regime lost legitimacy, the military fragmented, and excessive reliance on force alienated civilians. External support for rebels further hindered COIN efforts. The study underscores the need for balanced COIN strategies, integrating military action, government legitimacy, and popular support. These insights offer valuable lessons for addressing future insurgencies with a holistic approach.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
C. Phillips, “The Battle for Syria: International Rivalry in the New Middle East,” New Haven Yale Univ. Press, 2016.
C. von. Clausewitz, “On War, ed. and trans. Michael Howard and Peter Paret, indexed ed.,” New Jersey Princet. Univ. Press, 1984.
H. Strachan and S. Scheipers., “The Changing Character of War,” Oxford Oxford Univ. Press, 2011.
J. Holliday, “The Assad Regime: From Counterinsurgency to Civil War,” Washington, DC Inst. Study War, 2013.
D. Kilcullen, “Counterinsurgency,” Oxford Oxford Univ. Press, 2010.
S. Abboud, “Syria,” Cambridge Polity Press, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/688398.
D. H. Petraeus and J. F. Amos., “Counterinsurgency: FM 3-24,” Washington, DC Dep. Army, 2006.
C. R. Lister, “The Syrian Jihad: Al-Qaeda, the Islamic State and the Evolution of an Insurgency,” Oxford Oxford Univ. Press, 2015.
S. Heydemann, “Syria’s Uprising: Sectarianism, Regionalisation, and State Order in the Levant,” Calif. Fride Hippos, 2013.
D. Kilcullen, “The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One,” Oxford Oxford Univ. Press, 2009.
J. Yazigi, “Syria’s War Economy European Council on Foreign Relations Policy Brief no. 97,” London Eur. Counc. Foreign Relations, 2014.
M. Kofman and M. Rojansky., “What Kind of Victory for Russia in Syria?,” Mil. Rev., vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 6–23, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/Online-Exclusive/2018-OLE/Russia-in-Syria/
A. Ostovar, “Vanguard of the Imam: Religion, Politics, and Iran’s Revolutionary Guards,” Oxford Oxford Univ. Press, 2016.
C. M. Fleming, “New or Old Wars? Debating a Clausewitzian Future,” J. Strateg. Stud., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 213–241, 2013, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402390902743175.
T. Waldman, “Politics and War: Clausewitz’s Paradoxical Equation,” Parameters, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 13–24, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.2541.
C. Bassford, “Clausewitz’s Categories of War and the Supersession of ‘Absolute War,’” J. Strateg. Stud., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 381–399, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4948.8888.
M. van. Creveld, “The Transformation of War: The Most Radical Reinterpretation of Armed Conflict Since Clausewitz,” New York Free Press, 2005.
S. K. Sanderson, “Conflict Theory In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, edited by George Ritzer,” Malden, MA Blackwell Publ., 2007.
A. Sears, “A Good Book, In Theory: A Guide to Theoretical Thinking,” North York High. Educ. Univ. Toronto Press, 2008.
D. Galula, “Counterinsurgency Warfare: Theory and Practice,” Connect. Praeger Secur. Int., 2006.
J. A. Nagl, “Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife: Counterinsurgency Lessons from Malaya and Vietnam,” Chicago Univ. Chicago Press, 2005.
R. Thompson, “Defeating Communist Insurgency: The Lessons of Malaya and Vietnam,” New York F.A. Praeger, 1966.