The Challenges of Stakeholder Collaboration in Conservation Programs at Way Kambas National Park

Main Article Content

Irmayanti Irmayanti
Ani Agus Puspawati

Abstract

Collaborative governance has become a central approach in addressing complex conservation challenges that exceed the capacity of single actors. This study examines stakeholder collaboration in conservation programs at Way Kambas National Park, Indonesia, with a focus on identifying the key challenges that affect the sustainability of collaborative arrangements. The research adopts a qualitative case study approach, drawing on in-depth interviews, document analysis, and field observations involving government authorities, conservation organizations, and buffer-zone communities. The findings reveal that collaboration operates adaptively but remains constrained by several interrelated challenges, including rigid administrative procedures, dependence on external funding, socio-economic pressures affecting community participation, and the fragility of trust due to inconsistent communication and staff turnover. These challenges demonstrate that effective conservation collaboration requires more than formal partnerships; it depends on institutional flexibility, stable resource support, sustained community benefits, and continuous trust-building among actors. The study concludes that strengthening collaborative governance in conservation areas necessitates adaptive institutional mechanisms and long-term social and financial strategies to ensure enduring conservation outcomes.

Article Details

How to Cite
Irmayanti, I., & Puspawati, A. A. (2026). The Challenges of Stakeholder Collaboration in Conservation Programs at Way Kambas National Park. The Eastasouth Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 3(02), 371 – 378. https://doi.org/10.58812/esssh.v3i02.909
Section
Articles

References

[1] C. Ansell and A. Gash, “Collaborative governance in theory and practice,” J. Public Adm. Res. Theory, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 543–571, 2008, doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032.

[2] K. Emerson, T. Nabatchi, and T. Balogh, Collaborative Governance Regimes. Washington DC: Goeorgetown University Press, 2015.

[3] L. Hooghe and G. Marks, Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. America: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. All, 2001.

[4] B. Kurniawan, M. Rahmatunissa, S. B. Utami, and R. A. Buchari, “A Collaborative Governance Perspective in Ecotourism Development in Ujung Kulon National Park, Banten-Indonesia,” J. Ecohumanism, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 5775–5787, 2024, doi: 10.62754/joe.v3i8.5175.

[5] P. B. Orth and A. S. Cheng, “Who’s in Charge? The Role of Power in Collaborative Governance and Forest Management,” Humboldt J. Soc. Relat., vol. 40, no. 40, 2018.

[6] E. P. Weber, N. P. Lovrich, and M. Gaffney, “Collaboration, enforcement, and endangered species: A framework for assessing collaborative problem-solving capacity,” Soc. Nat. Resour., vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 677–698, 2005, doi: 10.1080/08941920591005034.

[7] T. Stiawati and M. Nuraeni, “Collaborative Governance in The Development of Mangrove Rehabilitation in Cigorondong Village Sumur District Pandeglang Regency,” Indones. J. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 714–725, 2024, doi: 10.11594/ijssr.05.02.31.

[8] E. Ostrom, R. Gardner, and J. Walker, “Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources.,” The Economic Journal, vol. 105, no. 431. p. 1034, 1995. doi: 10.2307/2235179.

[9] C. Wulandari et al., “Pengembangan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Kemitraan Konservasi Pemulihan Ekosistem Rawa Bunder di Taman Nasional Way Kambas (TNWK),” J. Pengabdi. Fak. Pertan. Univ. Lampung, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 205, 2023, doi: 10.23960/jpfp.v2i1.6411.

[10] C. Folke, T. Hahn, P. Olsson, and J. Norberg, “Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems,” Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., vol. 30, pp. 441–473, 2005, doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511.

[11] K. B. McIntyre and C. A. Schultz, “Facilitating collaboration in forest management: Assessing the benefits of collaborative policy innovation,” Land use policy, vol. 96, 2020.