Endogamous Marriage in the Habaib Community a Social Engineering Perspective by Roscoe Pound

Main Article Content

Silvia Yulianti
Ishaq Ishaq
Muhammad Faisol

Abstract

Ideally, Indonesian marriage law promotes an open marital system that does not restrict partner selection based on lineage. In social reality, however, the Habaib community in Lumajang Regency continues to practice endogamous marriage grounded in patrilineal lineage preservation. This study addresses the gap between the ideal inclusiveness of marriage law and the persistence of exclusive endogamous practices. The research novelty lies in examining Habaib endogamous marriage through the perspective of Law as a Tool of Social Engineering proposed by Roscoe Pound, which remains underexplored in previous studies. This research employs a qualitative phenomenological field approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and documentation, and analyzed using source triangulation and Roscoe Pound’s social engineering legal theory. The findings reveal that: (1) endogamous marriage practices among the Habaib community follow two patterns arranged marriages from childhood and marriages within kinship without formal arrangement; (2) four main factors drive these practices, namely lineage preservation, matchmaking traditions, familial doctrination, and the principle of marital compatibility (kufu’); and (3) from a social engineering perspective, law functions to sustain endogamy through the interplay of public, social, and private interest.

Article Details

How to Cite
Yulianti, S., Ishaq, I., & Faisol, M. (2026). Endogamous Marriage in the Habaib Community a Social Engineering Perspective by Roscoe Pound. The Eastasouth Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 3(02), 379 – 387. https://doi.org/10.58812/esssh.v3i02.986
Section
Articles

References

[1] J. Burhanuddin, Islam, authority, and change: Social dynamics of Muslim communities in Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2019.

[2] A. Azra, “Jaringan global dan lokal Islam Nusantara,” Bandung: Mizan, vol. 1423, 2002.

[3] A. Nurdin and Ridwansyah., “Konsep kafa’ah dalam perkawinan Islam: Perspektif fiqh dan sosiologi hukum,” Al-Ahkam J. Ilmu Syariah, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 221–240, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2020.30.2.5667.

[4] R. Fox, Kinship and marriage: An anthropological perspective, no. 50. cambridge university press, 1983.

[5] W. B. Hallaq, An introduction to Islamic law. Cambridge University Press, 2009.

[6] R. Pound, Social control through law. Routledge, 2017.

[7] R. Cotterrell, Law, culture and society: Legal ideas in the mirror of social theory. Routledge, 2017.

[8] C. Geertz, The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973.

[9] P. Berger and T. Luckmann, “The social construction of reality,” in Social Theory Re-Wired, Routledge, 2016.

[10] Darusman, “Endogamy and lineage preservation in traditional Muslim communities,” J. Islam. Soc. Stud., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 145–162, 2018.

[11] M. I. Al-Bukhari, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.

[12] A. Rachman, “Perkawinan sedarah dan dampaknya terhadap kesehatan genetika,” J. Kesehat. Masy., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 33–45, 2016.

[13] R. Pound and M. L. DeRosa, An introduction to the philosophy of law. Routledge, 2017.

[14] L. Rasjidi, “Dasar-dasar filsafat hukum,” 2004.