Traditional Leaders and the Legality of Punishment for Violence in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the position of customary officials and the legality of violent sanctions within the Indonesian criminal justice system. The research problem arises from the continued existence of customary punishment practices involving physical and psychological violence in customary law communities, while national criminal law establishes the state as the sole institution authorized to impose criminal penalties. This study employs a normative legal method with legislative, conceptual, and case-based approaches through a literature review of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The findings indicate that traditional officials possess sociological and constitutional legitimacy in maintaining order within traditional communities; however, their authority remains limited by the principle of legality and the protection of human rights. Restorative customary sanctions remain acceptable as long as they do not violate fundamental individual rights, whereas sanctions involving elements of violence can still be classified as criminal offenses under the Criminal Code. This study underscores the importance of harmonizing customary law with national criminal law through the strengthening of a restorative justice approach and the establishment of regulations that clearly define the limits of the authority of customary institutions.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
[1] A. Faisal et al., “Kedudukan Hukum Adat di Mandailing Natal dalam Bayang-Bayang KUHP Baru: Penerapan Sanksi Perzinaan dalam Peradilan Pidana,” QANUN J. Law Islam. Stud., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1815–1827, 2026, doi: 10.58738/qanun.v4i4.1341.
[2] W. Wijaya and M. Nurdin, “Strengthening the Existence of Customary Criminal Law as an Instrument for Local Law Enforcement in Indonesia,” J. Justitia J. Ilmu Huk. dan Hum., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 290–299, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/Justitia/article/view/14299
[3] H. Pakpahan, “The Customary Justice System and State Criminal Law: A Model of Reconciliation in Indonesia,” J. Criminol. Crim. Law, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 81–98, 2025, doi: 10.47152/rkkp.63.3.5.
[4] N. Toatubun and D. Djamaludin, “The Dialectic of the Principle of Legality and Living Law in the National Criminal Justice System Following the Enactment of Law No. 1 of 2023,” J. Ilmu Huk. Kyadiren, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 85–94, 2024, doi: 10.46924/jihk.v6i1.253.
[5] I. Setiawan, A. M. Wahyu, A. Rahman, and A. Sutrisno, “Juridical Study of Customary Law In The Indonesian National Legal System,” Asian J. Soc. Humanit., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 1824–1831, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://ajosh.org/jsh/article/view/317
[6] N. K. P. S. Wangi, K. F. Dantes, and K. Sudiatmaka, “Analisis Yuridis Hak Ulayat terhadap Kepemilikan Tanah Adat Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria,” J. Ilmu Huk. Sui Generis, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 112–121, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://semnas-fmipa.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JIH/article/view/2606
[7] S. Hamdani, A. D. A. Ningrum, and M. Muammar, “The Role of Customary Courts in Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System in the Effort to Reform National Criminal Law,” REUSAM J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 49–57, 2024, doi: 10.29103/reusam.v12i1.17992.
[8] I. M. Artana, T. A. Santosa, A. A. Roa, A. B. D. Kunu, and N. Miqat, “Restorative Justice Approaches in Criminal Law: Effectiveness and Societal Perceptions in Contemporary Legal Systems,” Pena Justisia Media Komun. dan Kaji. Huk., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 885–899, 2025, doi: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.6459.
[9] N. A. M. Sari, “Criminal Cases are regulated in the Criminal Code, which relates to the Principle of Legality in Criminal Law,” IBLAM Law Rev., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 10–17, 2026, doi: 10.52249/ilr.v6i1.659.
[10] M. Tampubolon and H. Roma, “Givu as a Criminal Sanction for the Taa Wana Indigenous Community and Its Relevance to National Criminal Justice Reform,” J. Law, Policy Glob., vol. 23, p. 39, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/download/34228830/Givu_as_Criminal_Sanctions_Tau_Taa_Wana_Indigenous_People.pdf
[11] H. Siburian, “The Death Penalty in Indonesia from a Human Rights Perspective,” Fox Justi J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 111–114, 2022, doi: 10.58471/justi.v12i2.647.
[12] I. D. Kurniawan, A. Aldyan, I. Septiningsih, M. Rustamaji, B. Santoso, and J. G. Santos, “Social-Legal Challenges of Customary Land in West Kalimantan: Customary Practices and National Law,” J. Pembaharuan Huk., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 473–487, 2024, doi: 10.26532/jph.v11i3.33860.
[13] A. Hariri and B. Babussalam, “Legal Pluralism: Concepts, Theoretical Dialectics, and Its Existence in Indonesia,” Walisongo Law Rev., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 146–170, 2024, doi: 10.21580/walrev.2024.6.2.25566.
[14] P. T. Karisma and Y. P. Anggellina, “The Conflict Between Human Rights and the Public Interest in Criminal Law Enforcement: A Contemporary Case Study,” AL-MANHAJ J. Huk. dan Pranata Sos. Islam, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2297–2306, 2023, doi: 10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3857.
[15] N. Robby et al., “The Application and Relevance of Customary Law in a Modern Context,” EKSEKUSI J. Ilmu Huk. dan Adm. Negara, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 470–478, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=74196359
[16] N. Katong, S. P. Junaedy, and D. C. Sendow, “Indigenous Communities and Customary Law in Lolayan Subdistrict, Bolaang Mongondow Regency within the Modern State,” West Sci. Law Hum. Rights, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 226–234, 2023, doi: 10.58812/wslhr.v1i04.261.
[17] M. Ira, “Customary Law in Aceh: Assessing Its Existence and Position within the National Legal System,” Innov. Law J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. Law, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 42–53, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://journal.lpkd.or.id/index.php/Humif/article/view/2375
[18] L. S. H. Rahakbauw, “Preserving traditions and harmony: The role of customary law in resolving customary land disputes,” J. Ilmu Huk. Kyadiren, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 12–23, 2023, doi: 10.46924/jihk.v5i1.177.
[19] O. R. Ruiz-Chiriboga, “Indigenous Corporal Punishment in Ecuador and the Prohibition of Torture and Ill-Treatment,” Am. Univ. Int. Law Rev., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 975–1047, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr/vol28/iss4/4/
[20] A. O. Fortune, “Punishment and Social Order in Pre-colonial Tiv Society,” Int. J. Law Soc., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 427–439, 2025, doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20250804.24.
[21] Y. N. D. Hurint, Y. I. Tanu, and Y. A. Wawo, “Traditional So’a Boxing and Confucian Ethics: Discovering Value in a Meaningful Tradition of Violence,” J. Sos. dan Pemerintah., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 99–105, 2025, doi: 10.71241/kg5c3p30.
[22] B. Suhariyanto, L. Mulyadi, F. Afandi, and S. R. P. Muhammad, “Reconstructing the intersection between customary courts and state criminal courts for indigenous communities in Papua,” J. Indones. Leg. Stud., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1107–1136, 2024, doi: 10.15294/jils.v9i2.19155.
[23] A. A. Gayo, “Penegakan Hukum Konflik Agraria yang Terkait dengan Hak-Hak Masyarakat Adat Pasca Putusan MK No. 35/PUU-X/2012,” J. Penelit. Huk. Jure, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 157–171, 2016, doi: 10.30641/dejure.2016.V16.157-171.
[24] F. A. Fitri, N. Muftia, I. Trilia, A. H. Munthe, and R. Ramlan, “Tinjauan Teoritis tentang Asas Legalitas dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia,” JIMMI J. Ilm. Mhs. Multidisiplin, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 202–209, 2024, doi: 10.71153/jimmi.v1i2.134.
[25] A. L. Tulia, “Constitutional Integration of Customary Law in Criminal Case Handling Mechanisms Based on the National Criminal Code (Law Number 1 of 2023),” Siyasah Dusturiyah State Law Rev., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 72–79, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.smartpedia.co.id/index.php/SDLR/article/view/102