Legal Strategy for Intellectual Property Protection in the Era of Open-source and Creative Commons in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study navigates Indonesia's shifting IP protection landscape by examining the advantages and challenges of coexisting traditional IP regimes with open-source projects and Creative Commons license. In this age of collaborative innovation, the article focuses on legal strategies for adjusting to the dynamic interplay between proprietary and open models. This study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining legal analysis, case studies, interviews, and surveys, to explore the impact of open-source dynamics, provide flexible legal solutions, and highlight the benefits and drawbacks of existing intellectual property laws. The study's findings contribute to the ongoing discussion about establishing a harmonious atmosphere that fosters innovation while upholding the rights of those who create. The creative community, lawmakers, and companies can all benefit from the recommendations.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
J. Scheibner, “The Bioinformatics Knowledge Commons: The Relationship between Governance Frameworks and Intellectual Property Rights in the Development of Open-source Bioinformatics Software”.
S. S. Kudryavtseva and O. V Minulina, “Trends in the development of the institution of intellectual property in ensuring innovative activities of industrial production,” Comput. Nanotechnol., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 76–86, 2021.
J. K. Scheibner, “Open-source bioinformatics: the intersection between formal intellectual property laws and user generated laws in the scientific research commons.” University of Tasmania, 2019.
J. Gamalielsson et al., “On Engagement with Open-source Software, Open-source Hardware, and Standard Setting: The Case of White Rabbit,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, 2022, pp. 1–2.
M. Mei and H. Tan, “Data expression and protection of intellectual property education resources based on machine learning,” Complexity, vol. 2021, pp. 1–11, 2021.
M. Garlick, “A review of creative commons and science commons,” Educ. Rev., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 78–79, 2005.
L. Rafianti, A. Suryamah, A. M. E. Putra, and A. M. Ramli, “Swing the angklung tube in the digital economy era: based on intangible cultural heritage and intellectual property rights perspective,” Indones. J. Int’l L., vol. 18, p. 323, 2020.
R. Baecker, “Open-source strategies for educational multimedia,” in EdMedia+ Innovate Learning, 2005, pp. 133–137.
P. S. Winanti, “The challenges of digital economy and copyright protection in Indonesia,” in Intellectual Property Rights and ASEAN Development in the Digital Age, Routledge, 2021, pp. 51–76.
H. N. Muchtar et al., “Stimulasi Urgensi Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual Karya Kreatif Dan Inovatif Karya Siswa Sma Negeri 8 Bandung Dalam Mendukung Ekonomi Digital,” Kumawula J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 66–73, 2021.
Ujang Badru Jaman, Galuh Ratna Putri, and Tiara Azzahra Anzani, “Urgensi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Cipta Karya Digital,” J. Rechten Ris. Huk. dan Hak Asasi Mns., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 2021, doi: 10.52005/rechten.v3i1.22.
U. B. Jaman, “Prospek Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) sebagai Jaminan Utang,” J. Huk. dan HAM Wara Sains, vol. 1, no. 01, pp. 15–20, 2022.
U. B. Jaman, G. R. Putri, and T. A. Anzani, “Urgensi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Cipta Karya Digital,” J. Rechten Ris. Huk. dan Hak Asasi Mns., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 2021.
K. Carillo and C. Okoli, “The open-source movement: a revolution in software development,” J. Comput. Inf. Syst., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2008.
D. Viduka, B. Ličina, and V. Kraguljac, “Open model of education using Open-source principles,” Trendovi u Posl., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 40–48, 2021.
Y. Ma, S. Fakhoury, M. Christensen, V. Arnaoudova, W. Zogaan, and M. Mirakhorli, “Automatic classification of software artifacts in open-source applications,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 2018, pp. 414–425.
M. O’Neill, “Riccardo Poli, William B. Langdon, Nicholas F. McPhee: A Field Guide to Genetic Programming: Lulu. com, 2008, 250 pp, ISBN 978-1-4092-0073-4.” Springer, 2009.
F. Ali and S. Dogan, “The inaugural issue of Journal of Global Hospitality and Tourism,” J. Glob. Hosp. Tour., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 90–92, 2022.
B. Chunli, S. Huaying, and X. Jiarong, “A study on Framework of Open Standard and Intellectual Property in E-business,” China Commun., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 89–93, 2007.
Z. Chen, “Is The Strict Global Protection of Intellectual Property Unfair for Developing Countries?,” 2006.
P. Brahma and A. Subrahmanyam, “Role of Traditional Weavers in Socio–Economic Development,” J. Law Sustain. Dev., vol. 11, no. 7, pp. e883–e883, 2023.
M. Matsushita, “A Japanese Perspective on Intellectual Property Rights and the GATT,” Colum. Bus. L. Rev., p. 81, 1992.
J. Li, “Intellectual property licensing tensions: utilising open-source software in the formal standard-setting context,” Eur. J. Law Technol., vol. 9, no. 2, 2018.
D. Kernohan, “Content that talks back: what does the MOOC explosion mean for content management?,” Insights, vol. 26, no. 2, 2013.
H. R. Reddy, “Jacobsen v. Katzer: the Federal Circuit weighs in on the enforceability of free and open-source software licenses,” Berkeley Tech. LJ, vol. 24, p. 299, 2009.
Y. Wang, Y. Chen, and B. Koo, “Open to your rival: Competition between open-source and proprietary software under indirect network effects,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1128–1154, 2020.
A. Dudley-Sponaugle, “The social and economical impact of OSS in developing countries,” in Handbook of Research on Open-source Software: Technological, Economic, and Social Perspectives, IGI Global, 2007, pp. 102–114.
T. Shenkoya and E. Kim, “A case study of the daedeok innopolis innovation cluster and its implications for Nigeria,” World Technop. Rev., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 104–119, 2019.
T. T. Ho, X. H. Tran, and Q. K. Nguyen, “Tax revenue-economic growth relationship and the role of trade openness in developing countries,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 2213959, 2023.