Bibliometric Evaluation of Open Access Publishing in Intellectual Property Rights
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study conducts a bibliometric evaluation of open access publishing in the realm of intellectual property rights (IPR), aiming to provide insights into the landscape, trends, and potential research directions within this domain. Utilizing data spanning from 1970 to 2024, encompassing 1000 papers with 9684 citations, the analysis employs network visualization, cluster analysis, and trend examination techniques. The results highlight the collaborative nature of scholarly endeavors in IPR, with key themes emerging around the economic implications of IPR, its intersection with global trade, biotechnology, and human rights. These findings offer valuable insights for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners, facilitating evidence-based decision-making and promoting transparency and accessibility in the dissemination of IPR-related knowledge.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
E. Salvador and P.-J. Benghozi, “‘The Digital Strategies of Publishing Houses: A Matter of Book Content?,’” Int. J. Arts Manag., vol. 23, pp. 56–74, Apr. 2021.
R. Kitchin and D. Fuller, The Academic’s Guide to Publishing. 2005.
T. W. Gordon, “Intellectual property,” Denver Univ. Law Rev., vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 829–841, 1996.
J. A. Brander, V. Cui, and I. Vertinsky, “China and intellectual property rights: A challenge to the rule of law,” J. Int. Bus. Stud., vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 908–921, 2017, doi: 10.1057/s41267-017-0087-7.
M. W. Peng, D. Ahlstrom, S. M. Carraher, and W. (Stone) Shi, “An institution-based view of global IPR history,” J. Int. Bus. Stud., vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 893–907, 2017, doi: 10.1057/s41267-016-0061-9.
Marcel Knöchelmann, “The Democratisation Myth: Open Access and the Solidification of Epistemic Injustices,” Sci. Technol. Stud., vol. 34, no. 2 SE-Research Papers, pp. 65–89, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.23987/sts.94964.
P. Andanda, “Towards a Paradigm Shift in Governing Data Access and Related Intellectual Property Rights in Big Data and Health-Related Research,” IIC - Int. Rev. Intellect. Prop. Compet. Law, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 1052–1081, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s40319-019-00873-2.
F. Bardi et al., “Organ-specific learning curves of sonographers performing first-trimester anatomical screening and impact of score-based evaluation on ultrasound image quality.,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 2, p. e0279770, 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279770.
B. Meinecke and S. Meinecke-Tillmann, “Lab partners: oocytes, embryos and company. A personal view on aspects of oocyte maturation and the development of monozygotic twins,” Anim. Reprod., vol. 20, p. e20230049, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2023-0049.
J. P. Tennant, F. Waldner, D. C. Jacques, P. Masuzzo, L. B. Collister, and C. H. J. Hartgerink, “The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review.,” F1000Research, vol. 5, p. 632, 2016, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8460.3.
G. E. Christian, “Issues and challenges to development of institutional repositories in academic and research institutions in Nigeria,” Open Scholarsh. Authority, Community, Sustain. Age Web 2.0 - Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Electron. Publ. ELPUB 2008, pp. 422–423, 2008.
R. Wellen, “Open Access, Megajournals, and MOOCs: On the Political Economy of Academic Unbundling,” SAGE Open, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 2158244013507271, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1177/2158244013507271.
W. Li, Q. Guo, M. Jakubowski, and M. Kelly, “A New Method for Segmenting Individual Trees from the Lidar Point Cloud,” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, vol. 78, pp. 75–84, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.14358/PERS.78.1.75.
B. Wessels et al., “Issues in the development of open access to research data,” Prometheus, vol. 32, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1080/08109028.2014.956505.
D. B. Jani, Challenges and opportunities for open access publishing during pandemic in India. 2021.
A. Raza and K. Malik, “Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A View through the Articles Published in the Second Decade of Twenty-First Century (2010–2014) — IV,” J. Intellect. Prop. Rights, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 347–376, 2023, doi: 10.56042/jipr.v28i4.1919.
T. O. Kolesnykova, “The Role of Libraries as Publishers in the Open Education Landscape: Reflecting Modern World Practice of Open Textbooks,” Univ. Libr. a New Stage Soc. Commun. Dev. Conf. Proc., vol. 0, no. 4 Se-Changing Roles: From Information Providers To Educators, pp. 88–99, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.15802/unilib/2019_187423.
N. Koutras, “The Evolving Role of Commercial Publishers and the Future of Open Access Repositories: The Potential of Corporate Social Responsibility,” Publ. Res. Q., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 391–417, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12109-019-09644-w.
M. Holgersson and S. Van Santen, “The Business of Intellectual Property: A Literature Review of IP Management Research,” Stock. Intellect. Prop. Law Rev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 44–63, 2018.
S. Mukherjee, “Patent Exhaustion and International Trade Regulation,” World Trade Inst. Adv. Stud., vol. 13, pp. 1–351, 2023, doi: 10.1163/9789004542815.
S. K. Rout, “A brief review on intellectual property rights with special attention on patent,” J. Appl. Adv. Res., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 73–77, 2018, doi: 10.21839/jaar.2018.v3i3.147.
E. van Zimmeren, “Chapter 2: Legal empirical studies of patenting and patent licensing practices,” Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023, pp. 27–46. doi: 10.4337/9781802206210.00008.
E. Derclaye, Research Handbook on Empirical Studies in Intellectual Property Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023. doi: 10.4337/9781802206210.
T. Clayton et al., “Enhancing intellectual property use for a stronger innovation ecosystem in Poland,” no. 138, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/42e389fa-en.
O. Seumenicht, H. Birch, V. Mudera, and R. Brown, “Structural changes in loaded equine tendons can be monitored by a novel spectroscopic technique,” J. Physiol., vol. 554, pp. 791–801, Feb. 2004, doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.054809.
P. Drahos, G. Ghidini, and H. Ullrich, Kritika: Essays on Intellectual Property: Volume 4. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020. doi: 10.4337/9781839101342.
R. C. Dreyfuss, “Chapter 1: The challenges facing IP systems: researching for the future,” Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020. doi: 10.4337/9781839101342.00008.
J. H. Reichman and P. F. Uhlir, “A Contractually Reconstructed Research Commons for Scientific Data in a Highly Protectionist Intellectual Property Environment,” Law Contemp. Probl., vol. 66, no. 1/2, pp. 315–462, Feb. 2003, [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20059181