Telemedicine: International Law Comparison

Main Article Content

Aris Prio Agus Santoso
Domingos Soares
Fazlin Fauzi
Sabrina Difa Amallia

Abstract

The main problems in telemedicine include the lack of uniformity in international regulations, limited technological infrastructure in some countries, and data protection and patient privacy. Additionally, legal responsibilities and malpractice risks have not been standardized. Gaps in access to services, especially in remote areas, and ethical challenges and quality standards are also obstacles. The purpose of this research is to find out international legal considerations regarding the use of Telemedicine and find solutions to overcome Telemedicine legal issues. This research uses a normative juridical approach with an emphasis on comparative studies. The results of the research were then analyzed qualitatively. Based on research results, show that Telemedicine is regulated differently in various countries. In Indonesia, it is regulated by Minister of Health Regulation Number 20 of 2019 for diagnosis, treatment, and continuing education with service costs borne by the health facility. Malaysia has a Telemedicine Act 1997, focused on follow-up care and drug prescriptions, growing rapidly in the private sector during the COVID-19 pandemic. Argentina published telehealth guidelines in 2019 and 2022, requiring health insurance companies to adopt teleconsultation platforms. Austria through the TeleHealth Commission since 2013 regulates telemonitoring, teletherapy, teleconciliation, and teleconferencing with strict data protection laws. Mexico integrates telehealth in general health services, regulated by IMSS and ISSSTE, while Russia regulates through the Health Protection Law with strict IT requirements. International telemedicine legal solutions require harmonization of regulations, personal data protection, information security standards, recognition of professional licenses, dispute resolution mechanisms, and legal liability regulations. Education and public awareness are essential to overcome these challenges, supported by international cooperation that strengthens the global legal infrastructure of telemedicine.

Article Details

How to Cite
Aris Prio Agus Santoso, Soares, D., Fauzi, F., & Amallia, S. D. (2024). Telemedicine: International Law Comparison. The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights, 2(03), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.58812/eslhr.v2i03.286
Section
Articles

References

C. Kuntardjo, “Dimensions of ethics and telemedicine in Indonesia: Enough of Permenkes Number 20 year 2019 as a frame of telemedicine practices in Indonesia?,” Soepra, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2020.

J. D. Blum, “The role of law in global e-health: a tool for development and equity in a digitally divided world,” . Louis ULJ, vol. 46, p. 85, 2002.

P. Whitten, B. Holtz, and C. Laplante, “Telemedicine,” Appl. Clin. Inform., vol. 1, no. 02, pp. 132–141, 2010.

A. de Oliveira Andrade et al., “On the use of telemedicine in the context of COVID-19: legal aspects and a systematic review of technology,” Res. Biomed. Eng., pp. 1–19, 2021.

P. Suwadi, P. W. Ayuningtyas, S. Y. Septiningrum, and R. Manthovani, “Legal comparison of the use of telemedicine between Indonesia and the United States,” Int. J. Hum. Rights Healthc., 2022.

G. Gioia and M. Salducci, “Medical and legal aspects of telemedicine in ophthalmology,” Rom. J. Ophthalmol., vol. 63, no. 3, p. 197, 2019.

F. N. Damayanti, A. Absori, K. Wardiono, and S. Rejeki, “Ethical and Legal Issues in the Use of Online-Based Health Services (E-Health),” SOEPRA, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 15–23, 2020.

J. R. Simatupang and S. Fahmi, “Efektivitas Penggunaan Media Telemedicine Berdasarkan Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia,” J. Huk. Samudra Keadilan, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 15–32, 2023.

P. Spradley, “Telemedicine: the law is the limit,” Tul. J. Tech. Intell. Prop., vol. 14, p. 307, 2011.

V. L. Raposo, “Telemedicine: The legal framework (or the lack of it) in Europe,” GMS Health Technol. Assess., vol. 12, 2016.

N. M. Hjelm, “Benefits and drawbacks of telemedicine,” Introd. to Telemedicine, Second Ed., pp. 134–149, 2017.

G. Nittari et al., “Telemedicine practice: review of the current ethical and legal challenges,” Telemed. e-Health, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1427–1437, 2020.

M. H. Afrilies and Y. T. Naili, “Legal Aspects of Telemedicine Health Services in the Perspective of Health Law in Indonesia in the Digital Era,” J. Adv. Heal. Informatics Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 2023.