Analysis of Joint Property Division in Mixed Marriages: A Case Study of The Supreme Court Decision Number 1400 K/Pdt/2017 Perspective of International Private Law

Main Article Content

Nurani Sofiyana
Rina Arum Prastyanti

Abstract

This study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of Indonesia's Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage, specifically concerning the division of joint property in mixed marriages that involve aspects of international civil law. Supreme Court Decree Number 1400 K/Pdt/2017 offers a key reference point, showcasing how Indonesian law has been applied to govern property division in these cases. The study applies a normative juridical approach to examine legal norms and standards, including legislative analysis of the Marriage Act and the Basic Agrarian Law. It also uses case-based methods to assess international civil law's impact, such as the principle of lex situs, which mandates that immovable property like land be governed by the laws of its location. This Supreme Court ruling reveals an attempt to balance Indonesian law with foreign property rights, ensuring that foreign nationals’ rights are acknowledged in property division. Such cases underscore the importance of reforming Indonesia’s mixed marriage laws to enhance legal clarity and fairness for all parties.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sofiyana, N., & Prastyanti, R. A. (2024). Analysis of Joint Property Division in Mixed Marriages: A Case Study of The Supreme Court Decision Number 1400 K/Pdt/2017 Perspective of International Private Law. The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights, 3(01), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.58812/eslhr.v3i01.354
Section
Articles

References

N. Herawati, A. Pancasilawati, and M. Rahmi, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Warga Negara Indonesia Yang Melakukan Perkawinan Dengan Warga Asing Terkait Perolehan Hak Tanah,” J. Ilmu Huk., vol. VII, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 2023.

D. Andriani and D. A. Prasetyo, “Legal Protection of The Rights of Indonesian Citizens for Children in Lifetime Mixed Marriages,” Int. J. Soc. Serv. Res., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 940–946, 2023, doi: 10.46799/ijssr.v3i4.327.

S. H. Ting and F. E. Berek, “Marriages of unequal languages: Use of Bidayuh among children from Chinese, Malay and Melanau mixed marriages,” Socioling. Stud., vol. 15, no. 2–4, pp. 323–343, 2021, doi: 10.1558/sols.41152.

T. Andrei, R. Bourbonnais, B. Oancea, and A. Mirica, “Mixed marriages in romania – the case of the hungarian minority,” Econ. Comput. Econ. Cybern. Stud. Res., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 5–14, 2020, doi: 10.24818/18423264/54.1.20.01.

I. H. Vermeulen and C. Govers, “Tensions Between the Ethnic and the Post - Ethnic Ethnicity, Change and Mixed Marriages in Mauritius,” pp. 1–27, 1997.

A. González-Ferrer, O. Obućina, C. Cortina, and T. Castro-Martín, “Mixed marriages between immigrants and natives in Spain: The gendered effect of marriage market constraints,” Demogr. Res., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–32, 2018, doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2018.39.1.

G. Potarca and L. Bernardi, “Mixed marriages in Switzerland: A test of the segmented assimilation hypothesis,” Demogr. Res., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1457–1494, 2018, doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.48.

R. A. P. E. Jaraputri, S. W. Rahayu, M. Din, and M. S. Ghifari, “Legal Consequences for a Notary Public With Double Professions As a Rector of a Private University Based on Law on Office of Notary Public,” Syariah J. Huk. dan Pemikir., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 25–35, 2023, doi: 10.18592/sjhp.v23i1.8611.

R. Rachman, E. Ardiansyah, and Sahrul, “A Juridical Review Towards The Land Rights Ownership In Mixed Marriage,” Jambura Law Rev., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2021, doi: 10.33756/jlr.v3i1.6857.

O. Sidabutar, L. Amalia, and M. Abas, “the Effects of Mixed Marriage Laws on the Division of Property Under the Marriage Law and International Civil Principles,” Awang Long Law Rev., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 490–497, 2024, doi: 10.56301/awl.v6i2.1189.

I. N. Sujana, “Legal Consequences of Divorce in Mixed Marriage,” J. Law, Policy Glob., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 53–58, 2017.

A. Long, L. Review, A. A. Wicaksana, S. Astutik, and W. Prawesthi, “Legal Protection Of Custody Of Dual Citizenship,” vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 411–416, 2024.

S. Alat, B. Perkara, B. U. Nomor, T. Elektronik, and R. S. Mamengko, “Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sam Ratulangi Lex Administratum Vol.XI/No.04/Jun/2023,” vol. 3, no. 04, pp. 215–225, 2023.

Q. Fachrina, N. H. Setiawan, T. Elisabet, and ..., “Implikasi Hukum Perdata Internasional Akibat Perceraian pada Perkawinan Campuran,” J. Pendidik. …, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 4117–4128, 2024.

E. Ribka and T. Wangkar, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak Waris Anak Dalam Perkawinan Campuran Ditinjau Dari Hukum Perdata Internasional,” J. Fak. Huk. Univ. Sam Ratulangi Lex Priv., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2023.

B. Nagara, “Pembagian Harta Gono-Gini Atau Harta Bersama Setelah Perceraian Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974,” Lex Crim., vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 51–57, 2016.

J. I. Hukum et al., “Warga Negara Indonesia Di Indonesia,” vol. 4, pp. 213–226, 2024.

Putu Andhika Kusuma Yadnya, “Meninjau Keadilan dalam Pembagian Harta Bersama Pasangan WNA dan WNI di Indonesia,” J. Huk. Sar., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 2, 2023.

L. Igo Karmed et al., “Penyelesaian Perkara Perkawinan Campuran Melalui Hukum Perdata Internasional,” J. Relasi Publik, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 256–263, 2023.

H. Y. Nikmah, “Pembagian Harta Bersama Akibat Perceraian dari Perkawinan Campuran Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan dan Kaidah Hukum Perdata Internasional,” Privat Law. p. 77, 2015.

Darwis L Rampay, “Hak Waris Anak Dalam Perkawinan Campuran Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2006 Tentang Kewarganegaraan ,” Moral. J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 2, no. 2, 2015.

M. T. Pradoto, “Aspek Yuridis Pembagian Harta Bersama Dalam Perkawinan (Tinjauan Hukum Islam dan Hukum Perdata),” Jurisprudence, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 85–91, 2014.

D. Anindya Harimurti, “Perbandingan Pembagian Harta Bersama Menurut Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam,” J. Gagasan Huk., vol. 3, no. 02, pp. 149–171, 2021, doi: 10.31849/jgh.v3i02.8908.

S. Rahman, N. Qamar, and M. Kamran, “Efektivitas Pembagian Harta Bersama Pasca Perceraian: Studi Kasus Perkawinan Poligami,” SIGn J. Huk., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 104–118, 2020, doi: 10.37276/sjh.v1i2.60.

B. Risky, “Konsep Pembagian Harta Bersama Menurut Hukum Islam Dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan,” Lentera Indones. J. Multidiscip. Islam. Stud., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 63–74, 2020, doi: 10.32505/lentera.v2i1.2115.

S. M. P. Utami and S. N. I. S. Dalimunthe, “Penerapan Teori Keadilan Terhadap Pembagian Harta Bersama Pasca Perceraian,” J. Usm Law Rev., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 433, 2023, doi: 10.26623/julr.v6i1.6899.

Etty Rochaeti, “Analisis Yuridis Tentang Harta Bersama (Gono Gini) Dalam Perkawinan Menurut Pandangan Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif,” J. Wawasan Huk., vol. 28, no. 01, p. 650, 2013.

J. Kenedi, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Harta Bersama,” J. Penelit. dan Pengabdi. Masy., vol. 3, p. 94, 2018.