Trademark Dispute Case in International Civil Law (Case Study of PK MARI Decision No.274 PK/Pdt/2003)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Brand disputes in the context of international civil law are increasing in line with the globalization of trade and rapid economic growth. This journal analyzes the Review Decision (PK) No. 274 PK/Pdt/2003 involving a trademark dispute between Prada SA, a leading fashion company from Italy, and PT Manggala Putra Perkasa in Indonesia. This study aims to explore the legal basis used by the Supreme Court in deciding this case as well as the implications of the ruling on trademark protection in international civil law. The research method used is a prescriptive legal approach whose data collection is through literature research and analysis of legal documents. The results show that the Supreme Court relies on previous jurisprudence and international treaties, such as the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, in providing decisions in favor of the protection of well-known brands. This ruling emphasizes the importance of good faith in trademark registration and provides stronger legal protection for well-known brands than ordinary marks. The implications of this decision are very significant, the target is not only brand owners, but also consumers and stakeholders in the Indonesian business world. This increase in protection is expected to create a more favorable investment environment and increase foreign investors' confidence in the Indonesian market. This finding is expected to be a reference for policymakers and legal practitioners in an effort to strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights in Indonesia and other countries.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
C. Dorynie, “Examining the Role of Alternative Dispute Resolution ( ADR ) and Small Claim Procedure in the Settlement of Civil Disputes in Uganda,” vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 13–17, 2024.
R. Thio, R. Christiawan, and W. Wagiman, “Trademark Law in the Digital Age: Challenges and Solutions for Online Brand Protection,” Glob. Int. J. Innov. Res., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 710–721, 2024, doi: 10.59613/global.v2i4.125.
R. M. Nodirbekovna, “International Legal Protection and Mechanism for the Protection of Trademark Rights,” Am. J. Appl. Sci. Technol., vol. 03, no. 02, pp. 44–64, 2023, doi: 10.37547/ajast/volume03issue02-06.
A. V. Potapenko, S. A. Pylypenko, V. M. Korolenko, and I. S. Melnyk, “Implementation of international standards for determining an efficient civil law remedy by a national court,” Int. J. Criminol. Sociol., vol. 10, no. 044, pp. 412–422, 2021, doi: 10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.49.
F. R. Development, “International Journal of Social Science Research and Review in Indonesia,” vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 83–95, 2024.
Y. Zhang, “Research on Dispute Resolution Mechanism for Construction Contract Disputes Based on Civil and Commercial Laws,” Sci. Law J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 10–14, 2024, doi: 10.23977/law.2024.030102.
R. S. Sadeghi, S. M. Asadinejad, and S. M. Asadinejad, “Civil Liability of Arbitrators in Virtual Arbitration in Cyberspace,” Int. J. Criminol. Crim. Law, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 01–06, 2023, doi: 10.33140/ijccl.01.01.01.
M. B. I. Susanto, G. Lie, and M. R. Syailendra Putra, “Legal Analysis of the IKEA Trademark Removal Dispute Case (Study of Decision Number 165 PK/Pdt.Sus/2012),” QISTINA J. Multidisiplin Indones., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 563–566, 2023, doi: 10.57235/qistina.v2i1.537.
A. C. Max, G. Lie, and M. R. Syailendra Putra, “Brand Dispute Case at GoTo Company,” QISTINA J. Multidisiplin Indones., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 467–471, 2023, doi: 10.57235/qistina.v2i1.520.
I. G. M. J. Adiputra, I. A. P. Widiati, and N. M. P. Ujianti, “Penyelesaian Perkara Pelanggaran Hak atas Merek,” J. Prefer. Huk., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 67–71, 2020, doi: 10.22225/jph.1.2.2343.67-71.
A. Prasetyo and A. Soemarmi, “Diponegoro Law Review Volume 1, Nomor 2, Tahun 2013,” J. Undip, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 1–11, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/572d219f-4175-39c0-98c4-f41327e3e68d/?utm_source=desktop&utm_medium=1.19.8&utm_campaign=open_catalog&userDocumentId=%7B7791ba13-f2a3-43cb-bf55-841e5d6d3d10%7D
N. Dewi and T. Baskoro, “Kasus Sengketa Merek Prada S.a Dengan Pt. Manggala Putra Perkasa Dalam Hukum Perdata Internasional,” J. Ius Const., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 18, 2019, doi: 10.26623/jic.v4i1.1531.
A. P. Komuna, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Internasional Terkait Hak Kekayaan Intelektual,” pp. 47–49, 2013.
A. Kurniawan and R. Rahaditya, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Atas Merek dalam Sengketa Merek,” J. Ilmu Hukum, Hum. dan Polit., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 914–921, 2024.
J. Ilmiah and W. Pendidikan, “2 1,2,” vol. 10, no. 15, pp. 445–449, 2024.