The Influence of International Human Rights Instruments on Domestic Legislation: A Comparative Study of Four Countries
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to give a comparative analysis of how these countries' legal systems, policies, and practices treat and implement international human rights norms. The methodology of this research utilizes a comparative research design, which combines primary and secondary data collection methods. Primary data was collected through semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders involved in human rights legislation, including government officials, legislators, human rights organizations, legal experts, and academics. This research contributes to the existing literature on human rights legislation in Southeast Asia by providing a comprehensive comparative analysis of the influence of international human rights instruments on domestic legislation. Its findings provide insights into the challenges and opportunities in incorporating human rights standards into domestic law and provide recommendations for strengthening human rights protection in Indonesia, Malaysia, Cambodia and Vietnam.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
M. Killander, “How international human rights law influences domestic law in Africa,” Law, Democr. Dev., vol. 17, no. 2012, pp. 378–392, 2013.
T. IHNATENKO, “Human Rights and International Standards: Correlation between National and International Legislation,” Univ. Sci. Notes, pp. 358–366, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.37491/UNZ.71.29.
R. W. Zinn and B. N. Perryman, “The impact of international law and domestic human rights law on Canada’s judicial supervision of the 1951 Refugee Convention,” in The UNHCR and the Supervision of International Refugee Law, J. C. Simeon, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 123–147. doi: DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139137225.010.
A. Fellmeth and S. McInerney-Lankford, “International Human Rights Law and the Concept of Good Governance,” Hum. Rights Q., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–37, 2022, doi: 10.1353/hrq.2022.0000.
Y. J. Kang, “A Short Note on the Impact of Globalization on Human Rights Law and Related Legal Research in South Korea,” 2018.
S. CHOUDHRY, Mandatory prosecution and arrest as a form of compliance with due diligence duties in domestic violence – the gender implications, 1st Editio. Routledge-Cavendish, 2009.
A. O. Jegede, P. Letuka, and T. Lubisi, “International Human Rights Law and the Access of Children of Asylum Seekers to Social Assistance in South Africa,” Comp. Int. Law J. South. Africa, vol. 53, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.25159/2522-3062/8060.
P. Pushkar, “Cases of the European Court of Human Rights Significant for European Integration of Ukraine: Levchuk v. Ukraine, Judgment of 3 September 2020 (Final on 3 December 2020): Case Commentary,” Nauk. Res. Pap. Law, vol. 6, pp. 73–76, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.18523/2617-2607.2020.6.73-76.
S. Paul, “Child Adoption In India: From A Human Rights Perspective,” J. Multidiscip. Cases, no. 21, pp. 28–35, 2022, doi: 10.55529/jmc.21.28.35.
J. M. Á. Silva and G. M. Bermúdez, “Obligaciones de los estados respecto de la protección de los derechos humanos: en el trabajo y la seguridad social,” Justicia, vol. 25, no. 37, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.17081/just.25.37.3911.
I. Shale, “Historical perspective on the place of international human rights treaties in the legal system of Lesotho: Moving beyond the monist-dualist dichotomy,” African Hum. Rights Law J., vol. 19, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.17159/1996-2096/2019/v19n1a10.
P. L. Hsieh, “New Investment Rulemaking in Asia: Between Regionalism and Domestication,” World Trade Rev., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 173–192, 2023, doi: DOI: 10.1017/S1474745622000362.
A. Z. Hilali, “US Interests and Policies in Southeast Asia,” Pakistan Horiz., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 67–96, Jun. 1991, [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41393913
H. Q. Tran and T. X. District, “International Cooperation to Combat Money Laundering in the Southeast Asia: A Narrative Perspective in Vietnam,” J. Law, Policy Glob., vol. 96, pp. 76–85, 2020, doi: 10.7176/jlpg/96-09.
P. Dorner and W. C. Thiesenhusen, “Selected Land Reforms in East and Southeast Asia: Their Origins and Impacts,” Asia. Pac. Econ. Lit., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 65–95, Mar. 1990, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8411.1990.tb00025.x.
J. W. Creswell, Research Design : Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif,. Kuantitatif dan Campuran, Edisi Keem. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2016.
J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications, 2016.
M. Muttaqien, “ASEAN Charter: A Compromise Agreement on Democracy and Human Rights,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 481–489, 2019, doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i5/5889.
S. Silva, Julio, Evanoff, John, Lutkenhouse, and Mike, “Southeast Asia - U.S. Regional Interests,” 1997.
A. Booth, “The economic development of Southeast Asia: 1870-1985,” Aust. Econ. Hist. Rev., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 20–52, 1991, doi: 10.1111/aehr.311003.
M. N. A. Nasir and A. N. A. E. Efendi, “Thematic Analysis on the Rights of Disabled People to Higher Education,” J. Educ. Soc. Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 8–17, 2019.
A. Quizon, “On the Customary Land Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Asia,” vol. 2003, no. 2001, pp. 1–16, 2015.