The Right to a Fair Trial: Comparative Analysis of International Human Rights Standards
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research paper presents a comparative analysis of the right to a fair trial in Indonesia and Brazil, focusing on the international human rights standards applicable in both countries. The study examines the legal frameworks, case studies, and challenges associated with fair trial rights in each country. Through a comprehensive review of literature and analysis of relevant legal provisions, the research highlights the issues of presumption of innocence, access to legal representation, impartiality of the judiciary, and the protection of vulnerable groups. The findings contribute to a better understanding of the practical implementation of fair trial rights and provide insights into areas that require attention and improvement. The research concludes by emphasizing the importance of aligning domestic laws and practices with international human rights standards to ensure comprehensive protection of fair trial rights in Indonesia and Brazil.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
A. Abdrabo, “The Right to a Fair Trial before The European Court of Human Rights,” Econ. Law Policy, vol. 2, p. p133, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.22158/elp.v2n2p133.
A. Paripurna, “The Right to a Fair Trial and Combatting Terrorism: The Case of Indonesia,” Indones. J. Int. Law, vol. 9, no. 1, 2011, doi: 10.17304/ijil.vol9.1.338.
O. Q. Swaak-Goldman, “The ICTY and the Right to a Fair Trial: A Critique of the Critics,” Leiden J. Int. Law, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 215–221, 1997, doi: DOI: 10.1017/S0922156597000198.
E. Pitrez Correa, “CONSTITUCIONALISMO COSMOPOLITA, IGUALDADE DE ARMAS E A INVESTIGAÇÃO DEFENSIVA: APONTAMENTOS SOBRE UM DIREITO HUMANO-FUNDAMENTAL,” Rev. Bras. Estud. Criminais, Feb. 2017.
E. Widder, A Fair Trial at the International Criminal Court? Human Rights Standards and Legitimacy. Berlin, Germany: Peter Lang Verlag, 2016. doi: 10.3726/978-3-653-07096-5.
M. Olena, P. Nadiia, and B. Iryna, “an Examination of the Administrative Courts of Ukraine in the Context of Understanding the Concept of ‘a Court Established By Law,’” Access to Justice East. Eur., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 96–112, 2022, doi: 10.33327/AJEE-18-5.2-a000218.
E. K. Prosper, “A critique on the investigation and adjudication powers of the Fair Competition Commission and finality clause of the Fair Competition Tribunal in Tanzania: a reflection from Jamaican and South African competition law.” University of Cape Town, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/9159
О. Штефан, “APLICATION OF THE PRINCIOLE OF EQUIVALENTS IN THE RESOLUTION OF PATENT DISPUTES: ANALYSIS OF FOREIGN CASE LAW,” Theory Pract. Intellect. Prop., 2020, doi: 10.33731/22020.208049.
Cliff Roberson and D. K. Das, An Introduction to Comparative Legal Models of Criminal Justice. Routledge, 2020.
H. R. Dammer and J. S. Albanese, Comparative Criminal Justice Systems, 5th editio. Cengage Learning, 2013.
N. B. Gayle, “WHAT ENSURES EFFECTIVE STATE-FUNDED LEGAL AID SYSTEM ? ( A guide for the reform of the current state-funded Legal Aid System in Jamaica ) Law on the Books Law in Action,” vol. 10, no. July 2009, pp. 1–61, 2013.