Exploring Student Perceptions of AI-Based Recruitment: A Qualitative Study at Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study explores the perceptions of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI) students regarding the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the recruitment process. As AI technologies increasingly influence hiring decisions through tools such as resume screening algorithms, chatbots, and video assessments, understanding how students perceive and interact with these systems is vital. Using a qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten final-year and postgraduate students from various faculties. Thematic analysis revealed five major themes: limited awareness of AI tools, perceived efficiency and objectivity, concerns about bias and data privacy, a preference for human judgment, and a strong call for institutional support. While students recognized AI's potential to improve hiring outcomes, many raised concerns about bias, accountability, and lack of knowledge. The findings underscore the importance of integrating AI literacy into higher education career services to equip students with a critical understanding of AI’s role in modern recruitment. This study contributes to the discourse on digital transformation in HR by amplifying the perspectives of future job seekers in an emerging market context.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
A. K. Upadhyay and K. Khandelwal, “Applying artificial intelligence: Implications for recruitment,” Strategic HR Review, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 255–258, 2018, doi: 10.1108/SHR-07-2018-0051.
E. Faliagka, K. Ramantas, A. Tsakalidis, and G. Tzimas, “Application of machine learning algorithms to an online recruitment system,” in Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Information Technology and e-Services, 2012, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICITeS.2012.6216618.
P. Tambe, P. Cappelli, and V. Yakubovich, “Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward,” Calif Manage Rev, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 15–42, 2019.
T. Horodyski, “The impact of AI on recruitment and selection processes,” Journal of Human Resource Technology, 2023.
T. Horodyski, “Incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into recruitment processes: Ethical considerations,” Journal of Ethics and Information Technology, 2024.
G. Mujtaba and R. Mahapatra, “Fairness in AI-based recruitment systems: Metrics, methods, and future directions,” 2024.
I. D. Raji and J. Buolamwini, “Actionable Auditing Revisited: Investigating the Impact of Publicly Naming Biased Performance Results of Commercial AI Products,” Commun ACM, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 101–108, 2023, doi: 10.1145/3571151.
A. Buhmann and C. Fieseler, “Towards a deliberative framework for responsible innovation in artificial intelligence,” Technol Soc, vol. 64, p. 101475, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101475.
Z. Milanović, G. Sporiš, N. Trajković, D. Sekulić, N. James, and G. Vučković, “Does SAQ training improve the speed and flexibility of young soccer players? A randomized controlled trial,” Hum Mov Sci, vol. 38, pp. 197–208, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.09.005.
E. Suwarno and B. Anggoro, “Preparing future graduates for the AI-driven job market: A case study of career services in Indonesian universities,” J Educ Techno Soc, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 97–109, 2023.
R. Rofaida and A. Ciptagustia, “Upgrading Business Performance Through Digital Literacy: Efforts To Achieve Competitive Advantages In The Industrial Revolution 4.0,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020.
S. Miller, “The role of artificial intelligence in the future of hiring,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 164, no. 3, pp. 545–556, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04238-2.
B. Cowgill, F. Dell’Acqua, and S. Deng, “Biased programmers? Or biased data? A field experiment in operationalizing AI ethics,” Columbia Business School Research Paper No. 20-86, 2021, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3664361.
R. Binns, M. Veale, M. Van Kleek, and N. Shadbolt, “‘It’s reducing a human being to a percentage’: Perceptions of justice in algorithmic decisions,” in Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2018, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1145/3173574.3173951.
I. Ajunwa, “The paradox of automation as anti-bias intervention,” Cardozo Law Rev, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1671–1722, 2020.
A. Ciptagustia and K. Kusnendi, “The dimension of Employer Branding and Employee Value Proposition at Academic Community Perspective,” The International Journal of Business Review (The Jobs Review), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 151–158, 2023.
D. Santoso and M. Wulandari, “Digital competence and career perception of Indonesian students in the AI era,” Jurnal Teknologi dan Pendidikan, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 34–48, 2022.
V. Gaffar, T. Koeswandi, and A. Ciptagustia, “Exploring the Role of CRM in MSMEs,” in 7th Global Conference on Business, Management, and Entrepreneurship (GCBME 2022), Atlantis Press, 2023, pp. 763–768.
D. D. Hanifah, R. Rofaida, and A. Ciptagustia, “Organizational culture and its impact on employee performance,” Human Resource Management Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 116–130, 2021.
J. W. Creswell, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 3rd ed. SAGE Publications, 2013.
S. B. Merriam, Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass, 2009.
J. W. Creswell, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 3rd ed. SAGE Publications, 2013.
V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual Res Psychol, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual Res Psychol, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.
M. Ragnedda, “Conceptualizing Digital Capital,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 2366–2375, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.006.
R. Binns, M. Veale, M. Van Kleek, and N. Shadbolt, “‘It’s reducing a human being to a percentage’: Perceptions of justice in algorithmic decisions,” in Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2018, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1145/3173574.3173951.
P. T. Knight and M. Yorke, Learning, Curriculum and Employability in Higher Education. RoutledgeFalmer, 2004. doi: 10.4324/9780203465271.
J. A. Colquitt, “On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 386–400, 2001, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386.
R. Binns, M. Veale, M. Van Kleek, and N. Shadbolt, “‘It’s reducing a human being to a percentage’: Perceptions of justice in algorithmic decisions,” in Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2018, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1145/3173574.3173951.
S. Barocas, M. Hardt, and A. Narayanan, Fairness and Machine Learning: Limitations and Opportunities. MIT Press, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262048613/fairness-and-machine-learning/
D. J. McAllister, “Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 24–59, 1995, doi: 10.5465/256727.
W. W. Seeley et al., “Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control,” Psychophysiology, vol. 59, no. 11, p. e14113, 2022, doi: 10.1111/psyp.14113.
T. Horodyski, “Applicant perceptions of AI in recruitment,” J Behav Exp Econ, p. 102034, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2023.102034.
A. Sen, Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press, 1999.
A. Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity. Polity Press, 1990.