Global Research on Learning Transfer: A Bibliometric Perspective Using Scopus Data

Main Article Content

Loso Judijanto

Abstract

This study examines the global development of learning transfer research through a bibliometric analysis of Scopus-indexed publications from 2000 to 2025. Using VOSviewer, the analysis maps keyword co-occurrences, thematic clusters, and intellectual linkages to reveal how learning transfer has evolved into a central paradigm within modern artificial intelligence. The findings show that research is dominated by four interconnected clusters: foundational deep learning concepts, computer vision applications, methodological advancements in transfer learning and domain adaptation, and emerging system-level applications such as reinforcement learning and federated learning. The prominence of terms like contrastive learning, fine tuning, and knowledge transfer highlights a shift toward more sophisticated, data-efficient, and privacy-conscious approaches. The dense interconnections among clusters demonstrate the field’s strong interdisciplinary nature, driven by collaborations across machine learning, cognitive science, and engineering. This study provides a comprehensive picture of the intellectual structure and emerging trajectories in learning transfer research, offering valuable insights for scholars, practitioners, and policymakers seeking to advance both theoretical foundations and practical applications.

Article Details

How to Cite
Judijanto, L. (2025). Global Research on Learning Transfer: A Bibliometric Perspective Using Scopus Data. The Eastasouth Journal of Learning and Educations, 3(03), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.58812/esle.v3i03.829
Section
Articles

References

J. Broisin, “Towards intelligent technology-enhanced learning solutions for transforming higher education: contributions and future directions.” Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, 2020.

M. M. Asad and A. Qureshi, “Impact of technology-based collaborative learning on students’ competency-based education: insights from the higher education institution of Pakistan,” High. Educ. Ski. Work. Learn., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 562–575, 2025.

T. T. H. Duong, “Utilizing Technology to Assess English Learning Outcomes of Students Based on a Competency-based Approach,” in ICTE Conference Proceedings, 2024, vol. 5, pp. 49–63.

C. Stock et al., “Soft striped magnetic fluctuations competing with superconductivity in Fe 1+ x Te,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 90, no. 12, p. 121113, 2014.

T. Rockstuhl et al., “Perceived organizational support (POS) across 54 nations: A cross-cultural meta-analysis of POS effects,” J. Int. Bus. Stud., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 933–962, 2020.

X. Chen, D. Zou, and H. Xie, “A decade of learning analytics: Structural topic modeling based bibliometric analysis,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 10517–10561, 2022.

M. A. Ayanwale, R. R. Molefi, and S. Oyeniran, “Analyzing the evolution of machine learning integration in educational research: a bibliometric perspective,” Discov. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 47, 2024.

X. Chen, X. Li, D. Zou, H. Xie, and F. L. Wang, “Metacognition research in education: topic modeling and bibliometrics,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 2025.

Y. Perez-Riverol et al., “The PRIDE database at 20 years: 2025 update,” Nucleic Acids Res., vol. 53, no. D1, pp. D543–D553, 2025.

D. Szklarczyk et al., “The STRING database in 2025: protein networks with directionality of regulation,” Nucleic Acids Res., vol. 53, no. D1, pp. D730–D737, 2025.

Y. Fan et al., “Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 489–530, 2025.

H. Dalla-Torre et al., “Nucleotide Transformer: building and evaluating robust foundation models for human genomics,” Nat. Methods, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 287–297, 2025.

Q. Qian, J. Luo, and Y. Qin, “Adaptive intermediate class-wise distribution alignment: A universal domain adaptation and generalization method for machine fault diagnosis,” IEEE Trans. neural networks Learn. Syst., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 4296–4310, 2024.

Z. Xiao et al., “CapMatch: Semi-supervised contrastive transformer capsule with feature-based knowledge distillation for human activity recognition,” IEEE Trans. neural networks Learn. Syst., 2023.

Q. Fang, Q. Sun, J. Ge, H. Wang, and J. Qi, “Multidimensional Engineering of Nanoconfined Catalysis: Frontiers in Carbon-Based Energy Conversion and Utilization,” Catalysts, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 477, 2025.

Y. Xiao, H. Shao, S. Yan, J. Wang, Y. Peng, and B. Liu, “Domain generalization for rotating machinery fault diagnosis: A survey,” Adv. Eng. Informatics, vol. 64, p. 103063, 2025.

S.-Y. Lu, Z. Zhu, Y. Tang, X. Zhang, and X. Liu, “CTBViT: A novel ViT for tuberculosis classification with efficient block and randomized classifier,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 100, p. 106981, 2025.

C. Chaccour, W. Saad, M. Debbah, Z. Han, and H. V. Poor, “Less data, more knowledge: Building next-generation semantic communication networks,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 37–76, 2024.