The Evolution of Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Research in Education: A Bibliometric Study

Main Article Content

Loso Judijanto

Abstract

This study aims to examine the evolution of Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) research in education through a bibliometric approach. The study analyzes scientific publications indexed in major academic databases over a specific period using bibliometric techniques such as co-occurrence, overlay visualization, and density mapping through VOSviewer software. The results show that HOTS research has experienced significant development, with a primary focus on pedagogical aspects, particularly on students, learning strategies, and critical thinking. The co-occurrence analysis reveals that core themes such as higher-order thinking skills, students, and education dominate the research landscape, reflecting a significant focus on the learning process. Temporal visualization reveals a shift from basic educational concepts to more innovative approaches such as problem-based learning and technology-based learning. Recent trends demonstrate increasing attention to the integration of digital technologies, such as artificial intelligence and deep learning, in HOTS development. Meanwhile, the density analysis indicates that although traditional pedagogical themes remain dominant, new topics related to technology and assessment offer broad research opportunities. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive mapping of the intellectual structure and trends of HOTS research and suggests directions for future research in educational innovation and policy.

Article Details

How to Cite
Judijanto, L. (2026). The Evolution of Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Research in Education: A Bibliometric Study. The Eastasouth Journal of Learning and Educations, 4(01), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.58812/esle.v4i01.967
Section
Articles

References

[1] A. Dilekçi and H. Karatay, “The effects of the 21st century skills curriculum on the development of students’ creative thinking skills,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 47, p. 101229, 2023.

[2] F. I. Muzaki, “Challenges in 21st Century of Teaching Critical Thinking: Navigating Creativity Challenges in Elementary Schools,” WIDYANTARA, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 2024.

[3] T. Siregar, “Balancing Higher-and Lower-Order Thinking Skills: An Analysis of Lecturers’ Pedagogical Practices in Higher Education,” Available SSRN 5590290, 2025.

[4] Z. Saeed, “Bloom’s Taxonomy in Pakistani School Education: A Pathway to Enhance Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS),” Crit. Rev. Soc. Sci. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 856–863, 2025.

[5] A. Finansu, J. Hidayah, and M. Fauziah, “Lots And Hots Analysis In Exercise Of English Textbook At Seventh Grade Of Smp It Rabbi Radhiyya.” Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup, 2025.

[6] A. Ragab, A. Kaid, and A. K. Sayed, “Enhancing higher order thinking skills (hots) in education: Strategies and outcomes,” TOFEDU Futur. Educ. J., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1488–1499, 2024.

[7] S. Setyarini, H. Salim, and P. Purnawarman, “Higher-Order Thinking Skills HOTS-based literacy media: An innovative learning strategy to promote the secondary students’ social awareness,” in Forum for Linguistic Studies (Transferred), 2023, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 1706.

[8] H. X. Vu, “Leveraging technology for higher-order thinking development: Instructional design strategies in higher education,” Int. J. Technol. Learn., vol. 32, no. 2, p. 25, 2025.

[9] A. R. Yadav and C. K. Singh, “An Exploration of Teaching Strategies That Promote Problem-Solving and Higher-Order Thinking Skills,” Int. J. Eng. Sci. Humanit., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 100–109, 2026.

[10] K. Sivakumar and M. Boon, “A preliminary higher order thinking skills (HOTS) framework for interdisciplinary problem solving and scientific research (IDPSSR) in engineering science education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., pp. 1–34, 2026.

[11] Y. Jing, C. Wang, Z. Chen, S. Shen, and R. Shadiev, “A bibliometric analysis of studies on technology‐supported learning environments: Hot topics and frontier evolution,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 1185–1200, 2024.

[12] M. Farrokhnia, S. K. Banihashem, O. Noroozi, and A. Wals, “A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 460–474, 2024.

[13] R. Glaser, “Education and thinking: The role of knowledge.,” Am. Psychol., vol. 39, no. 2, p. 93, 1984.

[14] D. T. Knowledge, “Education for life and work,” 2012.

[15] O. B. Assaraf and N. Orion, “Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education,” J. Res. Sci. Teach. Off. J. Natl. Assoc. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 518–560, 2005.

[16] J. M. Roschelle, R. D. Pea, C. M. Hoadley, D. N. Gordin, and B. M. Means, “Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies,” Futur. Child., pp. 76–101, 2000.

[17] A. Zohar and Y. J. Dori, “Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive?,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 145–181, 2003.

[18] W. Hung, D. H. Jonassen, and R. Liu, “Problem-based learning,” in Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, Routledge, 2008, pp. 485–506.

[19] B. Miri, B.-C. David, and Z. Uri, “Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 353–369, 2007.

[20] G. Fessakis, E. Gouli, and E. Mavroudi, “Problem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study,” Comput. Educ., vol. 63, pp. 87–97, 2013.

[21] A. L. Baylor and D. Ritchie, “What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms?,” Comput. Educ., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 395–414, 2002.